You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recently the ability has been added to hero blocks to select existing images. (Finally! Yay!)
But for existing images the dimension limits are completely ignored.
Steps To Reproduce
Open the hero block on the home page
As hero image select one of the cards images
Save
Actual behavior
The cards are 800px wide, nowhere near to the required 1200px (claimed by the field help text). But they're accepted and inserted without nagging.
Expected behavior
Nagging according to min width setting,
Additional information
In fact, this is a problem not only with hero images, but applies to all image fields. Using the image browser bypasses any validation. ... Interesting concept...
It seems like when improving the settings, somewhere on the road the validation was dropped (or never added).
Validation for uploads work as expected.
I'm aware that selecting existing images from library is a bit flaky, but if the text claims that there's a min setting, I'd expect some validation.
It's not urgent, just one of those WTF, that should be fixed...
Backdrop CMS version: 1.30.x-dev
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description of the bug
Recently the ability has been added to hero blocks to select existing images. (Finally! Yay!)
But for existing images the dimension limits are completely ignored.
Steps To Reproduce
Actual behavior
The cards are 800px wide, nowhere near to the required 1200px (claimed by the field help text). But they're accepted and inserted without nagging.
Expected behavior
Nagging according to min width setting,
Additional information
In fact, this is a problem not only with hero images, but applies to all image fields. Using the image browser bypasses any validation. ... Interesting concept...
It seems like when improving the settings, somewhere on the road the validation was dropped (or never added).
Validation for uploads work as expected.
I'm aware that selecting existing images from library is a bit flaky, but if the text claims that there's a min setting, I'd expect some validation.
It's not urgent, just one of those WTF, that should be fixed...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: