We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Per the spec sheet, one would expect that Seiko S-3511 chips that have no battery present send a status code of 0x80.
0x80
They instead in real-world testing send a status code of 0xFF.
0xFF
This is the same as when sampling noise from the bus. It would be good to find a way to differentiate the two states.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Per the spec sheet, one would expect that Seiko S-3511 chips that have no battery present send a status code of
0x80
.They instead in real-world testing send a status code of
0xFF
.This is the same as when sampling noise from the bus. It would be good to find a way to differentiate the two states.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: