You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There were originally plans for Namada to have a “liquid democracy.” A liquid democracy would enable us as stakers to arbitrarily delegate our governance voting power to any account, whereas the current implementation has staker governance power only delegated to the validators we’ve staked with. We understand that this would be a substantial core protocol engineering effort, and we would be in strong support for Heliax to implement what’s needed for a liquid democracy in the near to mid future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There were originally plans for Namada to have a “liquid democracy.” A liquid democracy would enable us as stakers to arbitrarily delegate our governance voting power to any account, whereas the current implementation has staker governance power only delegated to the validators we’ve staked with. We understand that this would be a substantial core protocol engineering effort, and we would be in strong support for Heliax to implement what’s needed for a liquid democracy in the near to mid future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: