Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement dense backend for proxqp solver #5

Open
traversaro opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #17
Open

Implement dense backend for proxqp solver #5

traversaro opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #17

Comments

@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@traversaro traversaro mentioned this issue Nov 7, 2024
Merged
@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor Author

By the way, proxqp developer provide this interesting euristics: https://simple-robotics.github.io/proxsuite/md_doc_22-ProxQP__api.html#OverviewWhichBackend . I would say that probably it could make sense to use the dense backend then, also by default?

@LoreMoretti @GiulioRomualdi @Gio-DS @mfussi66

@traversaro traversaro linked a pull request Nov 13, 2024 that will close this issue
Draft
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Draft of adding dense backend to proxqp ami-iit/qpsolvers-eigen
1 participant
@traversaro