Version 3 - Any sense of timing?

[dbi1]

Hi,

I started using AlpineJS recently, very much like how small / productive it feels. Thanks for building Alpine 👍

I am, however, a bit worried about the CSP unsafe-eval policy requirement you mention in the readme... Saw the issue discussion, and the note that this will likely be resolved in V3.

Any pointers what kind of timeframe we might be talking about until V3 comes out?

Thank you!

[HugoDF]

I can't speak around the timeframe but the note in the README around CSP is that we might re-evaluate the value of a CSP-friendly build for v3 but no guarantee that it will be included.

[dbi1]

Got it, thanks @hugo, it sounded more definitive to me in the issue itself: "For those who follow, v3 will have a more modular approach which should allow for a csp friendly build. Unfortunately, this is not possible in v2 without introducing breaking changes." (from #237 (comment)) Would love for this to happen, but I understand if this is not a priority.

[SimoTod]

Thanks for your feedback, to clarify: v3 WILL have a modular approach and it SHOULD allow for a csp friendly build. It's on our radar and keen on providing a good solution but we are still looking into options that would allow this without making Alpine too slow and too heavy.

…

On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, 13:06 dbi1, ***@***.***> wrote: Got it, thanks @hugo, it sounded more definitive to me in the issue itself: "For those who follow, v3 will have a more modular approach which should allow for a csp friendly build. Unfortunately, this is not possible in v2 without introducing breaking changes." (from #237 (comment)) Would love for this to happen, but I understand if this is not a priority. > Am 22.07.2020 um 16:59 schrieb Hugo ***@***.***>: > > > I can't speak around the timeframe but the note in the README around CSP is that we might re-evaluate the value of a CSP-friendly build for v3 but no guarantee that it will be included. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. > — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#669 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACAJRWMZLHZL7DO535VGIC3R6VJE3ANCNFSM4PEUXMWA> .

[dbi1]

Thank you @SimoTod, that sounds good.

Re timing of v3, is there possibly a rough sense (a few months, a year, more than a year)? Thank you again.

[ryangjchandler]

It all depends on priorities. The most important thing for us at the moment is making sure that Alpine is stable.

[dbi1]

Got it, thank you @ryangjchandler.

Will keep my fingers crossed for a not-too-distant v3 that will allow csp-friendly builds :)