Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some mathematical glyphs are out of style #346

Closed
philosaurus opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #454
Closed

Some mathematical glyphs are out of style #346

philosaurus opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #454

Comments

@philosaurus
Copy link

U+2200, U+2201, U+2203 and U+2204 look like they're from another font. They are way thicker than other symbols (60+ em vs the regular 50) and their style is completely different to the rest.

libertinus-math-out-of-style-glyphs

@khaledhosny
Copy link
Contributor

That is by nature of these symbols, check them in other math fonts (Computer Modern/Latin Modern, or Cambria for instance)

@philosaurus
Copy link
Author

To me they look small and "insignificant", even when compared to the other fonts mentioned. Cambria is close, but still seems a bit more prononced. They also look a little heavier than the other operators.
quantifiers

@Bolpat
Copy link

Bolpat commented Nov 5, 2020

I changed the writing style of my thesis (text for all versus ∀) because I so much dislike how the quantifiers look in Libertinus. They really should have the height of capital letters.

@ivo-s ivo-s mentioned this issue Mar 7, 2021
@ivo-s
Copy link
Contributor

ivo-s commented Mar 7, 2021

Hey @philosaurus and @Bolpat, see #454 for dicussion about resolving this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants