You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Functors are currently given the type/kind: Type↑ = ∀ {ℓ} → Type ℓ → Type ℓ . This disallows valid cases that the level changes in the output index, so we should carefully decide which ones we want to support + provide alternative definitions to cover the rest.
@WhatisRT has a use case for his axiomatic set-theory library, where one cannot a monad instance for the powerset construction.
Possible alternative definitions:
outer quantification: Type↑ a b = Type a → Type b (e.g. covers disjoint union / co-products, but fails for TC)
the ultra-general Type↑ f = ∀ {ℓ} → Type ℓ → Type (f ℓ)
...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Functors are currently given the type/kind:
Type↑ = ∀ {ℓ} → Type ℓ → Type ℓ
. This disallows valid cases that the level changes in the output index, so we should carefully decide which ones we want to support + provide alternative definitions to cover the rest.@WhatisRT has a use case for his axiomatic set-theory library, where one cannot a monad instance for the powerset construction.
Possible alternative definitions:
Type↑ a b = Type a → Type b
(e.g. covers disjoint union / co-products, but fails forTC
)Type↑ f = ∀ {ℓ} → Type ℓ → Type (f ℓ)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: