-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multi-account MailMover #324
Comments
Hey @kirelagin ,
Pretty-much yes, there is also a way to use disctinct config files but there is still duplication of the INBOX query, # Pro
Pro/INBOX = 'tag:spam':Pro/spam 'tag:sent':Pro/sent
Pro/archive = 'tag:':Pro/INBOX 'tag:spam':Pro/spam 'tag:sent':Pro/sent
Pro/spam = 'NOT tag:spam':Pro/INBOX 'tag:sent':Pro/sent
Pro/sent = 'NOT tag:sent':Pro/INBOX 'tag:spam':Pro/spam |
Having to do this for each account for many folders is a bit annoying, yes. |
I'm not sure if it fits here, but I've been trying to use different config files so I could use different email accounts. I'm not sure if solutions above would work as I'd also need different notmuch configurations for each account. Maybe being able to specify different config files to afew, is a good improvement?! |
As a follow-up to #162, I am looking to setting up notmuch/afew with multiple accounts (within the same maildir), as in the referenced issue.
FolderNameFilter
works really well, as described there, however I am not satisfied withMailMover
.That’s more of a question rather than a specific proposal. In my case, I am using
MailMover
to sync tags back to directories (like, Junk and Archive), I imagine, similar to how many other people do this. So, what I’d like to have is an easy way to say thatINBOX = 'tag:spam':Junk 'NOT tag:inbox':Archive
etc. should apply per-account. IIUC, currently, my only option is to copy-paste each group of rules for each account.Any ideas on how this can be improved? I mean, adding ad-hoc support specifically for this use-case to
MailMover
is probably pretty straightforward, but I am not sure whether this would be desired. Maybe there are some more general approaches.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: