Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

testcases.json contains 2 versions of Inapplicable Example 6 for akn7bn: Iframe with interactive elements is not excluded from tab-order #2222

Open
dd8 opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@dd8
Copy link
Collaborator

dd8 commented Nov 4, 2024

There are two test cases for Inapplicable Example 6 in https://www.w3.org/WAI/content-assets/wcag-act-rules/testcases.json

https://www.w3.org/WAI/content-assets/wcag-act-rules/testcases/akn7bn/a13349ef619df6256bd52acb8008760c3711f5dd.html
https://www.w3.org/WAI/content-assets/wcag-act-rules/testcases/akn7bn/c88fcaf4d90e2156de75a1cdad8734a3d75c49e4.html

These are identical apart from a semi-colon and extra whitespace in the <script> element

testcases.json contains this

    {
      "ruleId": "akn7bn",
      "ruleName": "Iframe with interactive elements is not excluded from tab-order",
      "ruleAccessibilityRequirements": {
      ....
      },
      "expected": "inapplicable",
      "testcaseId": "c88fcaf4d90e2156de75a1cdad8734a3d75c49e4",
      "testcaseTitle": "Inapplicable Example 6",
      "relativePath": "testcases/akn7bn/c88fcaf4d90e2156de75a1cdad8734a3d75c49e4.html",
      "url": "https://www.w3.org/WAI/content-assets/wcag-act-rules/testcases/akn7bn/c88fcaf4d90e2156de75a1cdad8734a3d75c49e4.html",
      "rulePage": "https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/act/rules/akn7bn/",
      "approved": true
    },

and this:

    {
      "ruleId": "akn7bn",
      "ruleName": "Iframe with interactive elements is not excluded from tab-order",
      "ruleAccessibilityRequirements": {
     ....
      },
      "expected": "inapplicable",
      "testcaseId": "a13349ef619df6256bd52acb8008760c3711f5dd",
      "testcaseTitle": "Inapplicable Example 6",
      "relativePath": "testcases/akn7bn/a13349ef619df6256bd52acb8008760c3711f5dd.html",
      "url": "https://www.w3.org/WAI/content-assets/wcag-act-rules/testcases/akn7bn/a13349ef619df6256bd52acb8008760c3711f5dd.html",
      "rulePage": "https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/act/rules/akn7bn/proposed/"
    },

Edit: just noticed one of the rulePages shows as https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/act/rules/akn7bn/ and the other as https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/act/rules/akn7bn/proposed/

@dd8
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dd8 commented Nov 5, 2024

Ok, looks like there are others:

Duplicate test case: Autocomplete attribute has valid value: Inapplicable Example 8
Duplicate test case: Autocomplete attribute has valid value: Inapplicable Example 9
Duplicate test case: Form field has non-empty accessible name: Passed Example 8
Duplicate test case: HTML page has non-empty title: Passed Example 2
Duplicate test case: Iframe with interactive elements is not excluded from tab-order: Inapplicable Example 6
Duplicate test case: Meta viewport allows for zoom: Passed Example 2
Duplicate test case: Meta viewport allows for zoom: Failed Example 2
Duplicate test case: Meta viewport allows for zoom: Failed Example 3
Duplicate test case: Scrollable content can be reached with sequential focus navigation: Passed Example 2
Duplicate test case: Scrollable content can be reached with sequential focus navigation: Inapplicable Example 2
Duplicate test case: Scrollable content can be reached with sequential focus navigation: Inapplicable Example 3
Duplicate test case: Scrollable content can be reached with sequential focus navigation: Inapplicable Example 6
Duplicate test case: Element in sequential focus order has visible focus: Passed Example 4
Duplicate test case: Element in sequential focus order has visible focus: Inapplicable Example 2
Duplicate test case: Text has minimum contrast: Passed Example 7
Duplicate test case: Text has enhanced contrast: Passed Example 6

@Jym77
Copy link
Collaborator

Jym77 commented Nov 18, 2024

Yes, as far as I remember, this is for "proposed" test cases that haven't yet been reviewed by TF/AG but have already been merged in ACT rules.

I'll summon @WilcoFiers for the technicalities…

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants