-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How did you evaluate the NME of your model and PRNet in 3D face reconstruction? #33
Comments
hi, how to get NME of PRNet,i get a bigger result compare to the NME paper. hope your reply!thanks! |
Hi @deepdarkfans , did you get your answer? I have the same question as we get 43K vertices using PRNet but the groundtruth for AFLW2000 data set has 53K vertices. |
No, but I have a method you can try. When calculating NME, you can multiply the ground truth of AFLW2000 by the weight matrix of the PRNet loss function, which should ignore the neck part |
I have a method you can try. When calculating NME, you can multiply the ground truth of AFLW2000 by the weight matrix of the PRNet loss function, which should ignore the neck part |
Thank you for your reply. Where can I find this weight matrix? Do you mean the uv_face _mask in ./Data folder? (below) |
Yes, you need to convert AFLW2000 to UV position map, |
Awesome! Thanks :) |
PRNet has different dimensions than any other model because the neck part is removed. When I evaluated PRNet and your model, I found that PRNet's has the worst NME, probably because I removed some dimensions from the ground truth, so how did you evaluate the two models?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: