You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For both CP and DP, the corrected images are saved as different bit depth than the original image during the IC step. I am not 100% sure why in the PyBaSiC method we rescaled and converted to 8-bit (which is reflected in CellProfiler) but it might be for good reason.
Looking back at this issue now, I see that when I implemented the methodology of PyBaSiC from Roshan in IDR_stream, I overlooked the part of the code was directly converting the images into 8-bit, which is why this occurred here.
This can easily be corrected for, but note this is why this occurred.
For both CP and DP, the corrected images are saved as different bit depth than the original image during the IC step. I am not 100% sure why in the PyBaSiC method we rescaled and converted to 8-bit (which is reflected in CellProfiler) but it might be for good reason.
Based on research, bit-depth is important if you convert and go down bit-depth like we do, we do it in the correct way (see https://bioimagebook.github.io/chapters/1-concepts/3-bit_depths/python.html) by rescaling then converting, but do we need to actually do this or not?
As well, the CP illumination correction pipeline is not automated like the CellProfiler analysis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: