You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to differentiate evaluations in a subset of special cases, versus evaluations on realistic datasets.
3 experiments related to: missing stops, merging, splitting. Of the type "for users with x, y, z properties, then this problem happens in a, b, c regime of parameters". Just proof of concept, no need for all combinations of everything.
Think of 1 experiment that is more general. Perhaps we look at a histogram of q (completeness) of an actual dataset, and at some preferential return patterns, and we test a whole population without focusing on special cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We need to differentiate evaluations in a subset of special cases, versus evaluations on realistic datasets.
3 experiments related to: missing stops, merging, splitting. Of the type "for users with x, y, z properties, then this problem happens in a, b, c regime of parameters". Just proof of concept, no need for all combinations of everything.
Think of 1 experiment that is more general. Perhaps we look at a histogram of q (completeness) of an actual dataset, and at some preferential return patterns, and we test a whole population without focusing on special cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: