-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Identify datasets for potential inclusion in the ODL #28
Comments
Another potential candidate: http://retractiondatabase.org/ — described by some as "antediluvian". |
Another one: https://orcid.org/blog/2018/10/24/2018-public-data-file . |
Datasets and code involved in projects for which there is a bug bounty, e.g. https://rubenarslan.github.io/posts/2018-10-26-on-making-mistakes-and-my-bug-bounty-program/ . |
allofplos, as per https://github.com/PLOS/allofplos |
https://doi.org/10.5061%2Fdryad.n5g39d7 - & mdash; probably the most comprehensive public dataset about Hemimastigophora to date |
"Teaching data science with real world datasets" |
Gaia star catalog data, as per http://sci.esa.int/gaia/60192-gaia-creates-richest-star-map-of-our-galaxy-and-beyond/ |
Here is some inspiration from the kinds of data and related services hosted at IDigInfo's data portal: |
One way to start looking into this would be to check open resources like
and see how sustainable/ usable the data are there.
On that basis, we could then decide (see also the inclusion criteria in ODL, as per #18 ) as to whether we'd like to go for datasets scoring high and/or low / average on those scales.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: