Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tree species audit very unstable when adding and editing new cases #366

Open
jsfried opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

tree species audit very unstable when adding and editing new cases #366

jsfried opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jsfried
Copy link

jsfried commented Oct 11, 2024

The 4FRI project (Arizona when loading the attached Plot CN list and choosing 41901 as the EVALID to load) has 15 species that are not found in the translation table. Doing a check all and adding those to the tree species table adds 15 records, some of which have partial data showing (e.g., common name, but not fvs_input_species) and some of which have no data (on common name or fvs input species via either numeric or letter coding). Not sure why there are these differences. placing the cursor on each line and clicking edit brings up the dialog that populated everything except for the common_name, which is apparently required:

image

One can type those in, and work through the list but I found the program unstable (crashed with an exception error several times before I could work through the whole list so I saved often). Then sometimes I could not save, as it would throw this error:

image

I am not a fan of this buggy workflow. It will not be uncommon that there are rarely found species that are not in the tree_species table and this becomes a real impediment for someone trying to get a project up and running. Another approach we might consider would be to allow a user to choose that any missing species be added as 298 OS if the FIA SPCD is <300 (softwood/hardwood threshold) and 998 OH if >= 300.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant