You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I attempted to replicate the results of the DAS baseline using your code, but encountered discrepancies with the results presented in the paper. I posttrained the model with a batch size of 16 due to resource limitations, while the README file suggests a batch size of 62. Below are the F1 scores and accuracies obtained:
Hello, I attempted to replicate the results of the DAS baseline using your code, but encountered discrepancies with the results presented in the paper. I posttrained the model with a batch size of 16 due to resource limitations, while the README file suggests a batch size of 62. Below are the F1 scores and accuracies obtained:
Acc:
0.8679 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.8616 0.7387 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.8616 0.7387 0.6889 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.8616 0.7387 0.6889 0.8246 0.0000 0.0000
0.8616 0.7387 0.6889 0.8246 0.6880 0.0000
0.8616 0.7387 0.6889 0.8246 0.6880 0.8051
F1:
0.7925 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.7858 0.7002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.7858 0.7002 0.5529 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.7858 0.7002 0.5529 0.7909 0.0000 0.0000
0.7858 0.7002 0.5529 0.7909 0.6880 0.0000
0.7858 0.7002 0.5529 0.7909 0.6880 0.6751
Could the discrepancy be related to the difference in batch size, or am I missing something else? Your insights would be appreciated. Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: