You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have experienced that sometimes I get more output when running:
snmpbulkwalk -v2c -c public -Cn0 -Cr10 IP_ADDRESS
than the tools currently running: onesixtyone and snmpwalk, could we also run snmpbulkwalk by default?
Edit:
Apparently this is because of ExtendedObjects, alternatively it seems we can also include a new command to get those extra objects: snmpwalk -v 1 -c public 192.168.1.1 NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendObjects
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
adamast0r
changed the title
Suggestion: running snmpbulkwalk to improve data from SNMP services
Suggestion: running snmpbulkwalk to get ExtendObjects
Oct 8, 2023
I have experienced that sometimes I get more output when running:
snmpbulkwalk -v2c -c public -Cn0 -Cr10 IP_ADDRESS
than the tools currently running: onesixtyone and snmpwalk, could we also run snmpbulkwalk by default?
Edit:
Apparently this is because of ExtendedObjects, alternatively it seems we can also include a new command to get those extra objects:
snmpwalk -v 1 -c public 192.168.1.1 NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendObjects
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: