-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move Tendrl builds from Copr to CentOS repos (Storage SIG) #16
Comments
Moving to CentOS Storage SIG would require:
In general, this is a good idea, as it would force us to:
That said, it seems to be long term effort. |
We are currently using copr for building of packages and the repo. It creates the repo automatically. It also support multiple distribution for which it uses its own build servers for epel7 and fedora and other distribution. However moving to CentOS repo could be an interesting option. It needs lot of effort. So initially till the time we moved completely to CentOS, I would suggest to keep our copr build mechanism. |
@r0h4n please assign to |
@TimothyAsirJeyasing I have sent a request to your new github id to become member of "Tendrl" org. Please accept the invite so that I can assign this issue to your new id as requested. Also, please provide a estimated date on this issue. |
We need to first have an account in centos sig and should joined to storage sig and any other applicable list of groups. Once its approved, we have to add our package into the group. After that we can start building the packages using koji and finally we can update our centos-ci repo with this changes. |
@TimothyAsirJeyasing , please get started on this |
Note that this requires both release engineering and packaging to actually follow fedora packaging guidelines. |
Based on comments from @mykaul Tendrl/tendrl-ansible#107
To better align with Gluster and Ceph in Centos storage SIG. The first step would be to have Tendrl builds saved in centos infra (we already use centos ci to make builds).
@mbukatov @mykau, once this is done we should discuss testing these Tendrl builds with gluster on centos7, currently we dont do that thoroughly, we mainly focus on gluster on rhel7.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: