Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do I need to incorporate LVIS novel categories (i.e., rare categories) when training the detector section (detpro)on LVIS? #9

Open
LMJ231 opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@LMJ231
Copy link

LMJ231 commented Dec 15, 2023

I noticed in your paper that you mentioned, 'In the validation set of TAO, 295 of the overlapping classes are present. 35 of these classes are defined as rare, which serve as our Cnovel.' and 'In the test set of TAO, there are 324 of the overlapping classes mentioned above present. 33 of these classes are defined as rare, which serve as our Cnovel.' I'd like to inquire whether the novel classes set in your benchmark (TAO's novel classes) overlap with LVIS's novel classes?

@siyuanliii
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry for the late reply. Yes, they are overlapping in the sense that the TAO novel classes we used are the subset of LVIS classes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants