Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ATTA: Consider third result value for known issues #11

Open
joanmarie opened this issue Sep 22, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

ATTA: Consider third result value for known issues #11

joanmarie opened this issue Sep 22, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@joanmarie
Copy link
Collaborator

Having sat down to resume debugging my ATTA this evening, I noticed there are a number of failures, all of which turned out to be the same bug (Gecko isn't exposing STATE_CHECKABLE on my platform).

I'm thinking it might be nice to add a third result value, so there's PASS, FAIL, and KNOWN_ISSUE (or something to that effect). This value would not be used by test authors because I don't think anything different should be done in how the tests are written or run. However, I can envision test runners and others examining the current state of implementations looking into a failure that someone else already knows about.

This should be easy to add to the ATTAs as an ATTA expectation. I'll come up with something to demonstrate it hopefully tomorrow (aka today).

@joanmarie joanmarie changed the title Consider third result value for known issues ATTA: Consider third result value for known issues Sep 22, 2016
halindrome pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 9, 2017
Add namespaced send command primitives
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant