bot.recursive
With respect to net neutrality and Title II. I encourage the commission to overturn Tom Wheeler's order to control the Internet. Internet users, rather than unelected bureaucrats, deserve to purchase whichever products we choose. Tom Wheeler's order to control the Internet is a exploitation of net neutrality. It undid a pro-consumer framework that performed fabulously successfully for two decades with both parties' support.
With respect to Internet regulation and net neutrality. I request the commission to reverse Obama's power grab to regulate broadband. Internet users, not the FCC Enforcement Bureau, deserve to use whatever services we choose. Obama's power grab to regulate broadband is a distortion of net neutrality. It stopped a light-touch approach that worked very well for many years with bipartisan backing.
Dear Commissioners: With respect to net neutrality. I want to encourage the FCC to repeal Obama's plan to control Internet access. Internet users, not big government, deserve to select whichever applications they want. Obama's plan to control Internet access is a exploitation of net neutrality. It ended a hands-off system that performed supremely well for two decades with nearly universal consensus.
bot.american-jobs
The free-market Internet was an incredible engine of economic growth, innovation, and job creation since the 1990s and has already been substantially slowed by the 2015 Net Neutrality rules. The slowdown in investment is destroying jobs and risks a big future tax hike to make up for lost private investment. Save American jobs by repealing Net Neutrality
bot.unprecedented
The unprecedented regulatory power the Obama Administration imposed on the internet
bot.outraged
I was outraged by the Obama/Wheeler FCC
form.diminished-investment
Obama’s Title II order has diminished broadband investment
form.freeourinternet
passed rules treating the internet as a government regulated public utility for the first time in history In 2015, wealthy leftist billionaires and powerful Silicon Valley monopolies took the internet
form.fwact
Dear Express Restoring Internet Freedom,
form.tpa
Obama's Federal Communications Commission (FCC) forced regulations on the internet that put the government
As a concerned taxpayer and consumer, I am writing to urge the FCC to set the internet free and remove the inappropriate, unnecessary and overly vast regulations currently holding back the full potential of the internet. Due to the grip of the utility-style regulations imposed under the previous Commission, taxpayers have been put at risk, the threat of new fees on consumer bills still looms large, investment in internet infrastructure has not realized its full potential, innovations have gone undeveloped and unrealized, and twenty years of the appropriate level of oversight of the internet has been reversed.
We must dial-back the poorly conceived application of Title II in the Open Internet Order so that American taxpayers can benefit from an unrestrained and truly open internet that scales back the unlimited power of the government, protects consumers from new taxes and encourages future investment and endless innovations.
bot.best_cop
Restore privacy by repealing Net Neutrality
The Title II order created a gaping gap in privacy protections by taking the best cop, the FTC, off the beat. That is reason enough to support Chairman Pai's proposal to restore Internet freedom. Restore privacy by repealing Net Neutrality.
bot.economics_free_zone
own chief economist Tim Brennan called the rules
The FCC's Net Neutrality rules were written in the Obama White House by political staff and Tech Industry special interests who overruled the FCC's own experts. The FCC's own chief economist Tim Brennan called the rules "an economics-free zone." They should be repealed.
bot.corrupt_result
corrupt result of a corrupt process
Obama's Net Neutrality order was the corrupt result of a corrupt process controlled by Silicon Valley special interests. It gives some of the biggest companies in the world a free ride at the expense of consumers and should be immediately repealed!
form.att
http://about.att.com/sites/open_internet
I am writing in regard to the Commission's work on preserving an open internet
there is a right way and a wrong way to preserve the concept of an open internet
While the internet has drastically changed over the years, our internet regulations remain outdated
the open internet is compromised when partisan politics and regulatory uncertainty come into play
work with each other to overturn the existing burdensome rules at the FCC and enact lasting legislation
time for Congress to provide clear direction by passing legislation that provides certainty
action to overturn the current law designed 80 years ago, before the Internet was created, is a great first step
While the internet has drastically changed over the years, our internet regulations remain outdated
I agree with the current FCC that heavy-handed regulations will do more harm than good
work to get rid of the rules that were harming the internet economy
urge you to work with your fellow members of Congress and the FCC to permanently preserve an open internet by supporting bipartisan legislation
believe only legislation can ensure we have permanent, enforceable open internet rules
Bipartisan legislation can help end the years-long political back-and-forth
get rid of the rules that unfairly and heavy-handedly enforced these principles
bot.telephone_monopoly
Title II is a Depression-era regulatory framework designed for a telephone monopoly that no longer exists. It was wrong to apply it to the Internet and the FCC should repeal it and go back to the free-market approach that worked so well.
bot.titleii_takeover
Dear FCC Commissioner ,
The Obama-era FCC regulations known as ""Title II"" enable the federal government to exert an extraordinary and unnecessary amount of regulatory control over the internet. This bureaucratic overreach impedes innovation, stifles investment and continues to create economic uncertainty for one of the largest sectors of the U.S. economy.
I support Chairman Pai's proposal to roll back Title II and restore the sensible regulatory framework that enjoyed broad bipartisan consensus and enabled the internet to thrive for more than two decades.
I strongly urge all of the FCC Commissioners to support the Chairman's proposal to repeal the harmful Title II internet takeover.
form.aclu
https://action.aclu.org/secure/comment-net-neutrality
I strongly oppose Chairman Pai's proposal to reverse net neutrality protections because a free and open internet is vital for our democracy, for our businesses, and for our daily lives.
Net neutrality is a vital principle in a democratic society. The biggest losers under Chairman Pai's proposal are independent news outlets, small businesses, start-up blogs, grassroots activist groups...and everyone who uses the internet. And we won't stay quiet while mega-corporations gain control over the information we consume every day.
Chairman Pai's pay-to-play model would give giant internet companies the power to prioritize what we read, watch, and explore online. I won't stand for it. It's about my right to be heard and my right to hear others. I submit my public comment to oppose Chairman Pai's proposal to reverse net neutrality protections.
form.battleforthenet
The FCC Open Internet Rules (net neutrality rules) are extremely important to me
reddit.technology
my understanding that the FCC Chairman intends to reverse net neutrality rules
blog.venturebeat
i support the existing net neutrality rules, which classify internet service providers under the title i
bot.internetuser
The FCC should throw out Chairman Ajit Pai's proposal to give the ISP monopolies
form.dearfcc
The FCC should safeguard Internet freedom by keeping the bright-line net neutrality protections in place and upholding Title II.
The FCC should throw out Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to give the government-subsidized telecom giants like AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon free rein to create Internet fast lanes, stripping users of the vital privacy and access rules we worked for and just recently won.
I’m concerned about ISPs being allowed to discriminate against certain types of data or websites because
Thankfully, the existing FCC regulations mean that ISPs can’t block or slow our access to certain web services or create Internet “fast lanes” by charging online services and websites more money to reach customers faster. That’s exactly the right balance to ensure the Internet remains a level playing field that benefits small businesses and Internet users as well as entrenched Internet companies. Pai’s proposal would transform ISPs into gatekeepers with the ability to veto new innovation and expression. That’s not how the Internet was built, and that's not what we want.
or
The FCC needs to stand up for Internet users like me and keep the net neutrality rules that are already in effect.
bot.illogically-named
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet
form.signforgood
Don't kill net neutrality. We deserve a free and open Internet
form.freepress
Net Neutrality is not negotiable
form.demandprogress
A free and open internet is critical for Americans to connect with their friends and family, exercise their freedom of speech
bot.dissapear
make sure net neutrality does not dissapear
make sure net neutrality does not dissapear. It is the only thing saving the internet at this moment. If it is removed many webservices will be at risk.
bot.telecommunications_act
I am in favor of strong net neutrality under Title II of the Telecommunications Act
bot.thenewsearchengine
small companies to compete with large online businesses up to the whims of our internet providers
We should not leave the ability for small companies to compete with large online businesses up to the whims of our internet providers. It is our responsibility to defend our right to free market competition. IF THENEWSEARCHENGINE is better than Google, Google's wealth should not strike down the new engine if our internet providers choose not to be benevolent. Please save net neutrality. My job as a freelance artist counts on it and so does millions of others!
bot.maga
mesmorized by money that it jeopardizes the well-being of its citizens. Is this how we MAGA
Leave the net neutrality alone. Internet speed should not be for sale. There is nothing wrong with out current system save for the greedy corporations who wish to turn the internet into their own pay-to-play and a government willing to let them do it. You serve the American people not just Verizon, AT&T, etc. IF you think the current protests are bad, try touching new neutrality. I will never understand why a nation who has come so far is hell bent on going back to the 18th century. No other modern nation is so mesmorized by money that it jeopardizes the well-being of its citizens. Is this how we MAGA?