Replies: 3 comments
-
OK found my mistake :)
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
It'd be nice if the code had a way to pass that information directly without needing the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
filed as #17 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello @Pomax ,
first of all thanks a lot for this wrapper !
I'm trying to connect remotely by adding the option
const options = { remote: { host: 'localhost', port: 5111 } };
cheers
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions