Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Defining imaging parameters #34

Open
facetorched opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Defining imaging parameters #34

facetorched opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@facetorched
Copy link

I would like to save ptu files that have a header which matches the TTTR image format described here. For example, the available parameters I know of are: ImgHdr_Dimensions, ImgHdr_Ident, ImgHdr_PixX, ImgHdr_PixY, ImgHdr_PixResol, ImgHdr_LineStart, ImgHdr_LineStop, ImgHdr_Frame, ImgHdr_BiDirect, ImgHdr_SinCorrection. As far as I have found in the documentation this is not currently possible through snAPI.

I am currently able to define markers with setMarkerEnable and setMarkerEdges in snAPI, but since these are not defined for LineStart, LineStop etc. I can't open it later as an image in another program (such as with ptufile).

I am using HydraHarp 400, usually use SymphoTime64 (now I am trying snAPI), I control the scanning and clocks through LabVIEW and NI DAQ card.

I would like there to be a way to define these imaging parameters in the config or otherwise through the API so that when the PTU file is saved, it contains the relevant header information. Furthermore, one should be able to set Measurement_SubMode = 3.

Alternatively, I have considered that I could modify the header with an external program to add these header entries post-acquisition.

@snizzleorg snizzleorg added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 30, 2024
@tpoint75
Copy link
Collaborator

That make sense, I think I could make it in the next release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants