Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ant subfamilies #347

Closed
opentreeapi opened this issue Apr 10, 2017 · 13 comments
Closed

Ant subfamilies #347

opentreeapi opened this issue Apr 10, 2017 · 13 comments

Comments

@opentreeapi
Copy link

Hello,
I'm looking at ants (Formicidae) in the tree. While I can see some information for genuses, the relationships aren't well resolved. In particular, the known subfamilies of ants aren't clearly separated. Would incorporating that kind of information be relevant here?

Some references include:

Thanks and kind regards,
Yannick

================================================

Metadata Do not edit below this line
Author yannick wurm
Upvotes 0
URL tree.opentreeoflife.org/opentree/argus/ottol@215086/Formicidae
Target node label Formicidae
Synthetic tree id opentree9.1
Synthetic tree node id ott215086
Source tree id(s)
Open Tree Taxonomy id
Supporting reference na
@mtholder
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the pointers. I've started to add the Moreau and Bell 2013 tree at: https://tree.opentreeoflife.org/curator/study/edit/ot_1056 we should be able to get that one at least in the supertree build the next time we run it.
I'll contact Dr. Ward to see if we can get some tree files from the other papers.

@arlin
Copy link

arlin commented Apr 12, 2018

@mtholder, I'm looking for trees to add from the suggestion list and I noticed this. What would it take to close this ticket? You have added the tree from Moreau, et al. 2013, and it has been curated, and it is staged for inclusion. There are about 14 ant phylogeny studies in TreeBASE with author P. Ward. I could add some of these. I could not quickly assess which are in OpenTree because when I filter the study list on "ward" I get about 150 studies (not sure why so many). By browsing the list, I would guess that OpenTree has a few small studies on ants from author P. Ward such as Brady, et al 2006 or Ward and Sumnicht.

@arlin
Copy link

arlin commented Apr 12, 2018

Compiling a list of TreeBASE studies by P. Ward

There are also 6 data packages on ants from P. Ward in Dryad. One of them is in TreeBASE: Chomicki et al is S17550. I checked and all of these have trees in them (not just pictures of trees)

So, 1 included, 1 queued, 7 needing curation, 4 than can be auto-uploaded from TreeBASE which is easy, 4 more that would require unknown amount of effort to identify and upload the desired tree from Dryad archive (these seem to have several dozen trees in each archive).

@mtholder
Copy link
Member

sounds great. Thanks, @arlin . I think that we can close this after we build the next version of the tree.

@arlin
Copy link

arlin commented Apr 12, 2018

Doing some of the curating now

  • ot_1245 Chomicki 2015 (S17550) - mapped taxa, identified ingroup, method, scale; just need to set root (I have contacted author).
  • ot_1247 Ward, et al. 2015 (S15764) - added, fixed citation, did some mapping, verified root.
  • S18146 - error uploading
  • ot_1248 Boudinot, et al. (S18604) -added, updated citation, mapped taxa, identified ingroup, method, scale. just needs root.
  • ot_1249 Ward & Fisher 2016 (S18847) - added, updated citation, rooted tree, identified ingroup, method, just needs license

@jar398
Copy link
Member

jar398 commented Apr 13, 2018

If you could add DOIs whenever you're looking at a study without one that would be wonderful. As I remember only about 50% of Treebase studies have DOIs in their records, but most (not all) fo the rest have DOIs that just aren't recorded.. I harvested a bunch of these DOIs when I did a batch lookup over the phylografter database back in 2013, but I know many DOI-missing studies remain. I recently came across a 2018 study where the curator didn't enter the DOI, which sort of baffles me.

DOIs give a stable link and machine-readable metadata, and are our best way to check for duplicates. You can usually find the DOI by visiting the article or its landing page. end of sermon.

@arlin
Copy link

arlin commented Apr 13, 2018

The error uploaded S18146 has been reported in OpenTreeOfLife/opentree#362

@arlin
Copy link

arlin commented Apr 13, 2018

yes @jar398 I'm making sure everything has a DOI.

@arlin
Copy link

arlin commented Apr 13, 2018

With email information from author Philip Ward, finished ot_1245 Chomicki 2015 (S17550) and ot_1248 Boudinot, et al. (S18604).

These 2 are now in the queue for synthesis.

@arlin
Copy link

arlin commented Apr 13, 2018

Ward & Fisher 2016 (S18847) is now in the queue for synthesis.

@arlin
Copy link

arlin commented Apr 25, 2018

@mtholder, I was talking with the OP today and this turns out to be an issue with discoverability. Actually the ant subfamilies (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ant_subfamilies) are mostly in the current synth tree (except the extinct ones) and they are distinguished. See the phylogeny of representative species below from phylotastic. The problem is that it is very hard to see this with the viewer. Is there some way to adjust the settings to show more levels, and maybe to highlight subfamilies?

ant_subfamilies

@mtholder
Copy link
Member

mtholder commented May 2, 2018

@mtholder
Copy link
Member

closing because we've added the ant trees targeted and created more specific issues for the UI problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants