Ripple effect wrongly triggered when scrolling #11
Comments
vutung2311
pushed a commit
to vutung2311/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2021
[ Upstream commit 18f855e ] Stefano reported a crash with using SQPOLL with io_uring: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000003b0 CPU: 2 PID: 1307 Comm: io_uring-sq Not tainted 5.7.0-rc7 OnePlusOSS#11 RIP: 0010:task_numa_work+0x4f/0x2c0 Call Trace: task_work_run+0x68/0xa0 io_sq_thread+0x252/0x3d0 kthread+0xf9/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 which is task_numa_work() oopsing on current->mm being NULL. The task work is queued by task_tick_numa(), which checks if current->mm is NULL at the time of the call. But this state isn't necessarily persistent, if the kthread is using use_mm() to temporarily adopt the mm of a task. Change the task_tick_numa() check to exclude kernel threads in general, as it doesn't make sense to attempt ot balance for kthreads anyway. Reported-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
vutung2311
pushed a commit
to vutung2311/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2021
This change solves below hangtask issue:
INFO: task kworker/u16:1:58 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-00590-g9983bdae4974e OnePlusOSS#11
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
kworker/u16:1 D 0 58 2 0x00000000
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-179:0)
Backtrace:
(__schedule) from [<c0913234>] (schedule+0x78/0xf4)
(schedule) from [<c017ec74>] (rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x24c/0x4c0)
(rwsem_down_write_slowpath) from [<c0915f2c>] (down_write+0x6c/0x70)
(down_write) from [<c0435b80>] (f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x608/0x7ac)
(f2fs_write_single_data_page) from [<c0435fd8>] (f2fs_write_cache_pages+0x2b4/0x7c4)
(f2fs_write_cache_pages) from [<c043682c>] (f2fs_write_data_pages+0x344/0x35c)
(f2fs_write_data_pages) from [<c0267ee8>] (do_writepages+0x3c/0xd4)
(do_writepages) from [<c0310cbc>] (__writeback_single_inode+0x44/0x454)
(__writeback_single_inode) from [<c03112d0>] (writeback_sb_inodes+0x204/0x4b0)
(writeback_sb_inodes) from [<c03115cc>] (__writeback_inodes_wb+0x50/0xe4)
(__writeback_inodes_wb) from [<c03118f4>] (wb_writeback+0x294/0x338)
(wb_writeback) from [<c0312dac>] (wb_workfn+0x35c/0x54c)
(wb_workfn) from [<c014f2b8>] (process_one_work+0x214/0x544)
(process_one_work) from [<c014f634>] (worker_thread+0x4c/0x574)
(worker_thread) from [<c01564fc>] (kthread+0x144/0x170)
(kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
Reported-and-tested-by: Ondřej Jirman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
vutung2311
pushed a commit
to vutung2311/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2021
[ Upstream commit 18f855e ] Stefano reported a crash with using SQPOLL with io_uring: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000003b0 CPU: 2 PID: 1307 Comm: io_uring-sq Not tainted 5.7.0-rc7 OnePlusOSS#11 RIP: 0010:task_numa_work+0x4f/0x2c0 Call Trace: task_work_run+0x68/0xa0 io_sq_thread+0x252/0x3d0 kthread+0xf9/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 which is task_numa_work() oopsing on current->mm being NULL. The task work is queued by task_tick_numa(), which checks if current->mm is NULL at the time of the call. But this state isn't necessarily persistent, if the kthread is using use_mm() to temporarily adopt the mm of a task. Change the task_tick_numa() check to exclude kernel threads in general, as it doesn't make sense to attempt ot balance for kthreads anyway. Reported-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
vutung2311
pushed a commit
to vutung2311/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2021
This change solves below hangtask issue:
INFO: task kworker/u16:1:58 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-00590-g9983bdae4974e OnePlusOSS#11
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
kworker/u16:1 D 0 58 2 0x00000000
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-179:0)
Backtrace:
(__schedule) from [<c0913234>] (schedule+0x78/0xf4)
(schedule) from [<c017ec74>] (rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x24c/0x4c0)
(rwsem_down_write_slowpath) from [<c0915f2c>] (down_write+0x6c/0x70)
(down_write) from [<c0435b80>] (f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x608/0x7ac)
(f2fs_write_single_data_page) from [<c0435fd8>] (f2fs_write_cache_pages+0x2b4/0x7c4)
(f2fs_write_cache_pages) from [<c043682c>] (f2fs_write_data_pages+0x344/0x35c)
(f2fs_write_data_pages) from [<c0267ee8>] (do_writepages+0x3c/0xd4)
(do_writepages) from [<c0310cbc>] (__writeback_single_inode+0x44/0x454)
(__writeback_single_inode) from [<c03112d0>] (writeback_sb_inodes+0x204/0x4b0)
(writeback_sb_inodes) from [<c03115cc>] (__writeback_inodes_wb+0x50/0xe4)
(__writeback_inodes_wb) from [<c03118f4>] (wb_writeback+0x294/0x338)
(wb_writeback) from [<c0312dac>] (wb_workfn+0x35c/0x54c)
(wb_workfn) from [<c014f2b8>] (process_one_work+0x214/0x544)
(process_one_work) from [<c014f634>] (worker_thread+0x4c/0x574)
(worker_thread) from [<c01564fc>] (kthread+0x144/0x170)
(kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
Reported-and-tested-by: Ondřej Jirman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Apr 24, 2021
commit ca4463b upstream. The VT_DISALLOCATE ioctl can free a virtual console while tty_release() is still running, causing a use-after-free in con_shutdown(). This occurs because VT_DISALLOCATE considers a virtual console's 'struct vc_data' to be unused as soon as the corresponding tty's refcount hits 0. But actually it may be still being closed. Fix this by making vc_data be reference-counted via the embedded 'struct tty_port'. A newly allocated virtual console has refcount 1. Opening it for the first time increments the refcount to 2. Closing it for the last time decrements the refcount (in tty_operations::cleanup() so that it happens late enough), as does VT_DISALLOCATE. Reproducer: #include <fcntl.h> #include <linux/vt.h> #include <sys/ioctl.h> #include <unistd.h> int main() { if (fork()) { for (;;) close(open("/dev/tty5", O_RDWR)); } else { int fd = open("/dev/tty10", O_RDWR); for (;;) ioctl(fd, VT_DISALLOCATE, 5); } } KASAN report: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in con_shutdown+0x76/0x80 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3278 Write of size 8 at addr ffff88806a4ec108 by task syz_vt/129 CPU: 0 PID: 129 Comm: syz_vt Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2 OnePlusOSS#11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20191223_100556-anatol 04/01/2014 Call Trace: [...] con_shutdown+0x76/0x80 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3278 release_tty+0xa8/0x410 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1514 tty_release_struct+0x34/0x50 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1629 tty_release+0x984/0xed0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1789 [...] Allocated by task 129: [...] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:669 [inline] vc_allocate drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:1085 [inline] vc_allocate+0x1ac/0x680 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:1066 con_install+0x4d/0x3f0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3229 tty_driver_install_tty drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1228 [inline] tty_init_dev+0x94/0x350 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1341 tty_open_by_driver drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1987 [inline] tty_open+0x3ca/0xb30 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2035 [...] Freed by task 130: [...] kfree+0xbf/0x1e0 mm/slab.c:3757 vt_disallocate drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c:300 [inline] vt_ioctl+0x16dc/0x1e30 drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c:818 tty_ioctl+0x9db/0x11b0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2660 [...] Fixes: 4001d7b ("vt: push down the tty lock so we can see what is left to tackle") Cc: <[email protected]> # v3.4+ Reported-by: [email protected] Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Apr 24, 2021
This change solves below hangtask issue:
INFO: task kworker/u16:1:58 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-00590-g9983bdae4974e OnePlusOSS#11
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
kworker/u16:1 D 0 58 2 0x00000000
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-179:0)
Backtrace:
(__schedule) from [<c0913234>] (schedule+0x78/0xf4)
(schedule) from [<c017ec74>] (rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x24c/0x4c0)
(rwsem_down_write_slowpath) from [<c0915f2c>] (down_write+0x6c/0x70)
(down_write) from [<c0435b80>] (f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x608/0x7ac)
(f2fs_write_single_data_page) from [<c0435fd8>] (f2fs_write_cache_pages+0x2b4/0x7c4)
(f2fs_write_cache_pages) from [<c043682c>] (f2fs_write_data_pages+0x344/0x35c)
(f2fs_write_data_pages) from [<c0267ee8>] (do_writepages+0x3c/0xd4)
(do_writepages) from [<c0310cbc>] (__writeback_single_inode+0x44/0x454)
(__writeback_single_inode) from [<c03112d0>] (writeback_sb_inodes+0x204/0x4b0)
(writeback_sb_inodes) from [<c03115cc>] (__writeback_inodes_wb+0x50/0xe4)
(__writeback_inodes_wb) from [<c03118f4>] (wb_writeback+0x294/0x338)
(wb_writeback) from [<c0312dac>] (wb_workfn+0x35c/0x54c)
(wb_workfn) from [<c014f2b8>] (process_one_work+0x214/0x544)
(process_one_work) from [<c014f634>] (worker_thread+0x4c/0x574)
(worker_thread) from [<c01564fc>] (kthread+0x144/0x170)
(kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
Reported-and-tested-by: Ondřej Jirman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
vutung2311
pushed a commit
to vutung2311/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit 18f855e ] Stefano reported a crash with using SQPOLL with io_uring: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000003b0 CPU: 2 PID: 1307 Comm: io_uring-sq Not tainted 5.7.0-rc7 OnePlusOSS#11 RIP: 0010:task_numa_work+0x4f/0x2c0 Call Trace: task_work_run+0x68/0xa0 io_sq_thread+0x252/0x3d0 kthread+0xf9/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 which is task_numa_work() oopsing on current->mm being NULL. The task work is queued by task_tick_numa(), which checks if current->mm is NULL at the time of the call. But this state isn't necessarily persistent, if the kthread is using use_mm() to temporarily adopt the mm of a task. Change the task_tick_numa() check to exclude kernel threads in general, as it doesn't make sense to attempt ot balance for kthreads anyway. Reported-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
vutung2311
pushed a commit
to vutung2311/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2021
This change solves below hangtask issue:
INFO: task kworker/u16:1:58 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-00590-g9983bdae4974e OnePlusOSS#11
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
kworker/u16:1 D 0 58 2 0x00000000
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-179:0)
Backtrace:
(__schedule) from [<c0913234>] (schedule+0x78/0xf4)
(schedule) from [<c017ec74>] (rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x24c/0x4c0)
(rwsem_down_write_slowpath) from [<c0915f2c>] (down_write+0x6c/0x70)
(down_write) from [<c0435b80>] (f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x608/0x7ac)
(f2fs_write_single_data_page) from [<c0435fd8>] (f2fs_write_cache_pages+0x2b4/0x7c4)
(f2fs_write_cache_pages) from [<c043682c>] (f2fs_write_data_pages+0x344/0x35c)
(f2fs_write_data_pages) from [<c0267ee8>] (do_writepages+0x3c/0xd4)
(do_writepages) from [<c0310cbc>] (__writeback_single_inode+0x44/0x454)
(__writeback_single_inode) from [<c03112d0>] (writeback_sb_inodes+0x204/0x4b0)
(writeback_sb_inodes) from [<c03115cc>] (__writeback_inodes_wb+0x50/0xe4)
(__writeback_inodes_wb) from [<c03118f4>] (wb_writeback+0x294/0x338)
(wb_writeback) from [<c0312dac>] (wb_workfn+0x35c/0x54c)
(wb_workfn) from [<c014f2b8>] (process_one_work+0x214/0x544)
(process_one_work) from [<c014f634>] (worker_thread+0x4c/0x574)
(worker_thread) from [<c01564fc>] (kthread+0x144/0x170)
(kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
Reported-and-tested-by: Ondřej Jirman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2022
[ Upstream commit 4224cfd7fb6523f7a9d1c8bb91bb5df1e38eb624 ]
When bringing down the netdevice or system shutdown, a panic can be
triggered while accessing the sysfs path because the device is already
removed.
[ 755.549084] mlx5_core 0000:12:00.1: Shutdown was called
[ 756.404455] mlx5_core 0000:12:00.0: Shutdown was called
...
[ 757.937260] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
[ 758.031397] IP: [<ffffffff8ee11acb>] dma_pool_alloc+0x1ab/0x280
crash> bt
...
PID: 12649 TASK: ffff8924108f2100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "amsd"
...
OnePlusOSS#9 [ffff89240e1a38b0] page_fault at ffffffff8f38c778
[exception RIP: dma_pool_alloc+0x1ab]
RIP: ffffffff8ee11acb RSP: ffff89240e1a3968 RFLAGS: 00010046
RAX: 0000000000000246 RBX: ffff89243d874100 RCX: 0000000000001000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000246 RDI: ffff89243d874090
RBP: ffff89240e1a39c0 R8: 000000000001f080 R9: ffff8905ffc03c00
R10: ffffffffc04680d4 R11: ffffffff8edde9fd R12: 00000000000080d0
R13: ffff89243d874090 R14: ffff89243d874080 R15: 0000000000000000
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
OnePlusOSS#10 [ffff89240e1a39c8] mlx5_alloc_cmd_msg at ffffffffc04680f3 [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#11 [ffff89240e1a3a18] cmd_exec at ffffffffc046ad62 [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#12 [ffff89240e1a3ab8] mlx5_cmd_exec at ffffffffc046b4fb [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#13 [ffff89240e1a3ae8] mlx5_core_access_reg at ffffffffc0475434 [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#14 [ffff89240e1a3b40] mlx5e_get_fec_caps at ffffffffc04a7348 [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#15 [ffff89240e1a3bb0] get_fec_supported_advertised at ffffffffc04992bf [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#16 [ffff89240e1a3c08] mlx5e_get_link_ksettings at ffffffffc049ab36 [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#17 [ffff89240e1a3ce8] __ethtool_get_link_ksettings at ffffffff8f25db46
OnePlusOSS#18 [ffff89240e1a3d48] speed_show at ffffffff8f277208
OnePlusOSS#19 [ffff89240e1a3dd8] dev_attr_show at ffffffff8f0b70e3
OnePlusOSS#20 [ffff89240e1a3df8] sysfs_kf_seq_show at ffffffff8eedbedf
OnePlusOSS#21 [ffff89240e1a3e18] kernfs_seq_show at ffffffff8eeda596
OnePlusOSS#22 [ffff89240e1a3e28] seq_read at ffffffff8ee76d10
OnePlusOSS#23 [ffff89240e1a3e98] kernfs_fop_read at ffffffff8eedaef5
OnePlusOSS#24 [ffff89240e1a3ed8] vfs_read at ffffffff8ee4e3ff
OnePlusOSS#25 [ffff89240e1a3f08] sys_read at ffffffff8ee4f27f
OnePlusOSS#26 [ffff89240e1a3f50] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff8f395f92
crash> net_device.state ffff89443b0c0000
state = 0x5 (__LINK_STATE_START| __LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER)
To prevent this scenario, we also make sure that the netdevice is present.
Signed-off-by: suresh kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
andreock
referenced
this issue
in andreock/android_kernel_realme_sm8250
Aug 31, 2022
[ Upstream commit c5c97cadd7ed13381cb6b4bef5c841a66938d350 ]
The ubsan reported the following error. It was because sample's raw
data missed u32 padding at the end. So it broke the alignment of the
array after it.
The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have
an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data.
27: Sample parsing :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4:
runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type
'__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment
0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here
00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
^
#0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13
#1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8
#2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9
#3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9
#4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9
#5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4
#6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9
#7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11
#8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8
#9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2
#10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3
#11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc)
#12 0x561532596828 in _start ...
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use
util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in
Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
andreock
referenced
this issue
in andreock/android_kernel_realme_sm8250
Sep 1, 2022
This patch is to fix a crash: #3 [ffffb6580689f898] oops_end at ffffffffa2835bc2 #4 [ffffb6580689f8b8] no_context at ffffffffa28766e7 #5 [ffffb6580689f920] async_page_fault at ffffffffa320135e [exception RIP: f2fs_is_compressed_page+34] RIP: ffffffffa2ba83a2 RSP: ffffb6580689f9d8 RFLAGS: 00010213 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: fffffc0f50b34bc0 RCX: 0000000000002122 RDX: 0000000000002123 RSI: 0000000000000c00 RDI: fffffc0f50b34bc0 RBP: ffff97e815a40178 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: ffff97e83ffc9000 R10: 0000000000032300 R11: 0000000000032380 R12: ffffb6580689fa38 R13: fffffc0f50b34bc0 R14: ffff97e825cbd000 R15: 0000000000000c00 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #6 [ffffb6580689f9d8] __is_cp_guaranteed at ffffffffa2b7ea98 #7 [ffffb6580689f9f0] f2fs_submit_page_write at ffffffffa2b81a69 #8 [ffffb6580689fa30] f2fs_do_write_meta_page at ffffffffa2b99777 #9 [ffffb6580689fae0] __f2fs_write_meta_page at ffffffffa2b75f1a #10 [ffffb6580689fb18] f2fs_sync_meta_pages at ffffffffa2b77466 #11 [ffffb6580689fc98] do_checkpoint at ffffffffa2b78e46 #12 [ffffb6580689fd88] f2fs_write_checkpoint at ffffffffa2b79c29 #13 [ffffb6580689fdd0] f2fs_sync_fs at ffffffffa2b69d95 #14 [ffffb6580689fe20] sync_filesystem at ffffffffa2ad2574 #15 [ffffb6580689fe30] generic_shutdown_super at ffffffffa2a9b582 #16 [ffffb6580689fe48] kill_block_super at ffffffffa2a9b6d1 OnePlusOSS#17 [ffffb6580689fe60] kill_f2fs_super at ffffffffa2b6abe1 OnePlusOSS#18 [ffffb6580689fea0] deactivate_locked_super at ffffffffa2a9afb6 OnePlusOSS#19 [ffffb6580689feb8] cleanup_mnt at ffffffffa2abcad4 OnePlusOSS#20 [ffffb6580689fee0] task_work_run at ffffffffa28bca28 OnePlusOSS#21 [ffffb6580689ff00] exit_to_usermode_loop at ffffffffa28050b7 OnePlusOSS#22 [ffffb6580689ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa280560e OnePlusOSS#23 [ffffb6580689ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa320008c This occurred when umount f2fs if enable F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION with F2FS_IO_TRACE. Fixes it by adding IS_IO_TRACED_PAGE to check validity of pid for page_private. Signed-off-by: Yu Changchun <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
andreock
referenced
this issue
in andreock/android_kernel_realme_sm8250
Sep 1, 2022
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565 PID: 257 TASK: ecdd0000 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "init" #0 [<c0b420ec>] (__schedule) from [<c0b423c8>] #1 [<c0b423c8>] (schedule) from [<c0b459d4>] #2 [<c0b459d4>] (rwsem_down_read_failed) from [<c0b44fa0>] #3 [<c0b44fa0>] (down_read) from [<c044233c>] #4 [<c044233c>] (f2fs_truncate_blocks) from [<c0442890>] #5 [<c0442890>] (f2fs_truncate) from [<c044d408>] #6 [<c044d408>] (f2fs_evict_inode) from [<c030be18>] #7 [<c030be18>] (evict) from [<c030a558>] #8 [<c030a558>] (iput) from [<c047c600>] #9 [<c047c600>] (f2fs_sync_node_pages) from [<c0465414>] #10 [<c0465414>] (f2fs_write_checkpoint) from [<c04575f4>] #11 [<c04575f4>] (f2fs_sync_fs) from [<c0441918>] #12 [<c0441918>] (f2fs_do_sync_file) from [<c0441098>] #13 [<c0441098>] (f2fs_sync_file) from [<c0323fa0>] #14 [<c0323fa0>] (vfs_fsync_range) from [<c0324294>] #15 [<c0324294>] (do_fsync) from [<c0324014>] #16 [<c0324014>] (sys_fsync) from [<c0108bc0>] This can be caused by flush_dirty_inode() in f2fs_sync_node_pages() where iput() requires f2fs_lock_op() again resulting in livelock. Reported-by: Zhiguo Niu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2023
commit 573ae4f13f630d6660008f1974c0a8a29c30e18a upstream. With special lengths supplied by user space, register_shm_helper() has an integer overflow when calculating the number of pages covered by a supplied user space memory region. This causes internal_get_user_pages_fast() a helper function of pin_user_pages_fast() to do a NULL pointer dereference: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000010 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 173 Comm: optee_example_a Not tainted 5.19.0 OnePlusOSS#11 Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pc : internal_get_user_pages_fast+0x474/0xa80 Call trace: internal_get_user_pages_fast+0x474/0xa80 pin_user_pages_fast+0x24/0x4c register_shm_helper+0x194/0x330 tee_shm_register_user_buf+0x78/0x120 tee_ioctl+0xd0/0x11a0 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa8/0xec invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114 Fix this by adding an an explicit call to access_ok() in tee_shm_register_user_buf() to catch an invalid user space address early. Fixes: 033ddf1 ("tee: add register user memory") Cc: [email protected] Reported-by: Nimish Mishra <[email protected]> Reported-by: Anirban Chakraborty <[email protected]> Reported-by: Debdeep Mukhopadhyay <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Jerome Forissier <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> [JW: backport to stable-4.19 + update commit message] Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jan 19, 2023
…g the sock [ Upstream commit 3cf7203ca620682165706f70a1b12b5194607dce ] There is a race condition in vxlan that when deleting a vxlan device during receiving packets, there is a possibility that the sock is released after getting vxlan_sock vs from sk_user_data. Then in later vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(), vxlan_get_sk_family() we will got NULL pointer dereference. e.g. #0 [ffffa25ec6978a38] machine_kexec at ffffffff8c669757 OnePlusOSS#1 [ffffa25ec6978a90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c0a4d OnePlusOSS#2 [ffffa25ec6978b58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c1c48 OnePlusOSS#3 [ffffa25ec6978b60] oops_end at ffffffff8c627f2b OnePlusOSS#4 [ffffa25ec6978b80] page_fault_oops at ffffffff8c678fcb OnePlusOSS#5 [ffffa25ec6978bd8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d109542 OnePlusOSS#6 [ffffa25ec6978c00] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d200b62 [exception RIP: vxlan_ecn_decapsulate+0x3b] RIP: ffffffffc1014e7b RSP: ffffa25ec6978cb0 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8aa000888000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffff8a9fc7ab803e RDI: ffff8a9fd1168700 RBP: ffff8a9fc7ab803e R8: 0000000000700000 R9: 00000000000010ae R10: ffff8a9fcb748980 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a9fd1168700 R13: ffff8aa000888000 R14: 00000000002a0000 R15: 00000000000010ae ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 OnePlusOSS#7 [ffffa25ec6978ce8] vxlan_rcv at ffffffffc10189cd [vxlan] OnePlusOSS#8 [ffffa25ec6978d90] udp_queue_rcv_one_skb at ffffffff8cfb6507 OnePlusOSS#9 [ffffa25ec6978dc0] udp_unicast_rcv_skb at ffffffff8cfb6e45 OnePlusOSS#10 [ffffa25ec6978dc8] __udp4_lib_rcv at ffffffff8cfb8807 OnePlusOSS#11 [ffffa25ec6978e20] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu at ffffffff8cf76951 OnePlusOSS#12 [ffffa25ec6978e48] ip_local_deliver at ffffffff8cf76bde OnePlusOSS#13 [ffffa25ec6978ea0] __netif_receive_skb_one_core at ffffffff8cecde9b OnePlusOSS#14 [ffffa25ec6978ec8] process_backlog at ffffffff8cece139 OnePlusOSS#15 [ffffa25ec6978f00] __napi_poll at ffffffff8ceced1a OnePlusOSS#16 [ffffa25ec6978f28] net_rx_action at ffffffff8cecf1f3 OnePlusOSS#17 [ffffa25ec6978fa0] __softirqentry_text_start at ffffffff8d4000ca OnePlusOSS#18 [ffffa25ec6978ff0] do_softirq at ffffffff8c6fbdc3 Reproducer: https://github.com/Mellanox/ovs-tests/blob/master/test-ovs-vxlan-remove-tunnel-during-traffic.sh Fix this by waiting for all sk_user_data reader to finish before releasing the sock. Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> Fixes: 6a93cc9 ("udp-tunnel: Add a few more UDP tunnel APIs") Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2023
…ction commit 57054fe516d59d03a7bcf1888e82479ccc244f87 upstream. Since there is no protection for vd, a kernel panic will be triggered here in exceptional cases. You can refer to the processing of axi_chan_block_xfer_complete function The triggered kernel panic is as follows: [ 67.848444] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000060 [ 67.848447] Mem abort info: [ 67.848449] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 67.848451] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 67.848454] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 67.848456] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 67.848458] Data abort info: [ 67.848460] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ 67.848462] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 67.848465] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000800c4c0b000 [ 67.848468] [0000000000000060] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 67.848472] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [OnePlusOSS#1] SMP [ 67.848475] Modules linked in: dmatest [ 67.848479] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.100-emu_x2rc+ OnePlusOSS#11 [ 67.848483] pstate: 62000085 (nZCv daIf -PAN -UAO +TCO BTYPE=--) [ 67.848487] pc : axi_chan_handle_err+0xc4/0x230 [ 67.848491] lr : axi_chan_handle_err+0x30/0x230 [ 67.848493] sp : ffff0803fe55ae50 [ 67.848495] x29: ffff0803fe55ae50 x28: ffff800011212200 [ 67.848500] x27: ffff0800c42c0080 x26: ffff0800c097c080 [ 67.848504] x25: ffff800010d33880 x24: ffff80001139d850 [ 67.848508] x23: ffff0800c097c168 x22: 0000000000000000 [ 67.848512] x21: 0000000000000080 x20: 0000000000002000 [ 67.848517] x19: ffff0800c097c080 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 67.848521] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 67.848525] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 67.848529] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000040 [ 67.848533] x11: ffff0800c0400248 x10: ffff0800c040024a [ 67.848538] x9 : ffff800010576cd4 x8 : ffff0800c0400270 [ 67.848542] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0800c04003e0 [ 67.848546] x5 : ffff0800c0400248 x4 : ffff0800c4294480 [ 67.848550] x3 : dead000000000100 x2 : dead000000000122 [ 67.848555] x1 : 0000000000000100 x0 : ffff0800c097c168 [ 67.848559] Call trace: [ 67.848562] axi_chan_handle_err+0xc4/0x230 [ 67.848566] dw_axi_dma_interrupt+0xf4/0x590 [ 67.848569] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x60/0x220 [ 67.848573] handle_irq_event+0x64/0x120 [ 67.848576] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc4/0x220 [ 67.848580] __handle_domain_irq+0x80/0xe0 [ 67.848583] gic_handle_irq+0xc0/0x138 [ 67.848585] el1_irq+0xc8/0x180 [ 67.848588] arch_cpu_idle+0x14/0x2c [ 67.848591] default_idle_call+0x40/0x16c [ 67.848594] do_idle+0x1f0/0x250 [ 67.848597] cpu_startup_entry+0x2c/0x60 [ 67.848600] rest_init+0xc0/0xcc [ 67.848603] arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c [ 67.848606] start_kernel+0x4cc/0x500 [ 67.848610] Code: eb0002ff 9a9f12d6 f2fbd5a2 f2fbd5a3 (a94602c1) [ 67.848613] ---[ end trace 585a97036f88203a ]--- Signed-off-by: Shawn.Shao <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
sreelekshman
pushed a commit
to sreelekshman/android_kernel_realme_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2023
[ Upstream commit 05bb0167c80b8f93c6a4e0451b7da9b96db990c2 ] ACPICA commit 770653e3ba67c30a629ca7d12e352d83c2541b1e Before this change we see the following UBSAN stack trace in Fuchsia: #0 0x000021e4213b3302 in acpi_ds_init_aml_walk(struct acpi_walk_state*, union acpi_parse_object*, struct acpi_namespace_node*, u8*, u32, struct acpi_evaluate_info*, u8) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/dispatcher/dswstate.c:682 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x233302 realme-sm8250-devs#1.2 0x000020d0f660777f in ubsan_get_stack_trace() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:41 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x3d77f realme-sm8250-devs#1.1 0x000020d0f660777f in maybe_print_stack_trace() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:51 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x3d77f realme-sm8250-devs#1 0x000020d0f660777f in ~scoped_report() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:387 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x3d77f realme-sm8250-devs#2 0x000020d0f660b96d in handlepointer_overflow_impl() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:809 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x4196d realme-sm8250-devs#3 0x000020d0f660b50d in compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:815 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x4150d OnePlusOSS#4 0x000021e4213b3302 in acpi_ds_init_aml_walk(struct acpi_walk_state*, union acpi_parse_object*, struct acpi_namespace_node*, u8*, u32, struct acpi_evaluate_info*, u8) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/dispatcher/dswstate.c:682 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x233302 OnePlusOSS#5 0x000021e4213e2369 in acpi_ds_call_control_method(struct acpi_thread_state*, struct acpi_walk_state*, union acpi_parse_object*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/dispatcher/dsmethod.c:605 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x262369 OnePlusOSS#6 0x000021e421437fac in acpi_ps_parse_aml(struct acpi_walk_state*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/parser/psparse.c:550 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2b7fac OnePlusOSS#7 0x000021e4214464d2 in acpi_ps_execute_method(struct acpi_evaluate_info*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/parser/psxface.c:244 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2c64d2 OnePlusOSS#8 0x000021e4213aa052 in acpi_ns_evaluate(struct acpi_evaluate_info*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nseval.c:250 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x22a052 OnePlusOSS#9 0x000021e421413dd8 in acpi_ns_init_one_device(acpi_handle, u32, void*, void**) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nsinit.c:735 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x293dd8 OnePlusOSS#10 0x000021e421429e98 in acpi_ns_walk_namespace(acpi_object_type, acpi_handle, u32, u32, acpi_walk_callback, acpi_walk_callback, void*, void**) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nswalk.c:298 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2a9e98 OnePlusOSS#11 0x000021e4214131ac in acpi_ns_initialize_devices(u32) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nsinit.c:268 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2931ac OnePlusOSS#12 0x000021e42147c40d in acpi_initialize_objects(u32) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/utilities/utxfinit.c:304 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2fc40d OnePlusOSS#13 0x000021e42126d603 in acpi::acpi_impl::initialize_acpi(acpi::acpi_impl*) ../../src/devices/board/lib/acpi/acpi-impl.cc:224 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0xed603 Add a simple check that avoids incrementing a pointer by zero, but otherwise behaves as before. Note that our findings are against ACPICA 20221020, but the same code exists on master. Link: acpica/acpica@770653e3 Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2023
[ Upstream commit 0b0747d507bffb827e40fc0f9fb5883fffc23477 ] The following processes run into a deadlock. CPU 41 was waiting for CPU 29 to handle a CSD request while holding spinlock "crashdump_lock", but CPU 29 was hung by that spinlock with IRQs disabled. PID: 17360 TASK: ffff95c1090c5c40 CPU: 41 COMMAND: "mrdiagd" !# 0 [ffffb80edbf37b58] __read_once_size at ffffffff9b871a40 include/linux/compiler.h:185:0 !# 1 [ffffb80edbf37b58] atomic_read at ffffffff9b871a40 arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:27:0 !# 2 [ffffb80edbf37b58] dump_stack at ffffffff9b871a40 lib/dump_stack.c:54:0 # 3 [ffffb80edbf37b78] csd_lock_wait_toolong at ffffffff9b131ad5 kernel/smp.c:364:0 # 4 [ffffb80edbf37b78] __csd_lock_wait at ffffffff9b131ad5 kernel/smp.c:384:0 # 5 [ffffb80edbf37bf8] csd_lock_wait at ffffffff9b13267a kernel/smp.c:394:0 # 6 [ffffb80edbf37bf8] smp_call_function_many at ffffffff9b13267a kernel/smp.c:843:0 # 7 [ffffb80edbf37c50] smp_call_function at ffffffff9b13279d kernel/smp.c:867:0 # 8 [ffffb80edbf37c50] on_each_cpu at ffffffff9b13279d kernel/smp.c:976:0 # 9 [ffffb80edbf37c78] flush_tlb_kernel_range at ffffffff9b085c4b arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:742:0 OnePlusOSS#10 [ffffb80edbf37cb8] __purge_vmap_area_lazy at ffffffff9b23a1e0 mm/vmalloc.c:701:0 OnePlusOSS#11 [ffffb80edbf37ce0] try_purge_vmap_area_lazy at ffffffff9b23a2cc mm/vmalloc.c:722:0 OnePlusOSS#12 [ffffb80edbf37ce0] free_vmap_area_noflush at ffffffff9b23a2cc mm/vmalloc.c:754:0 OnePlusOSS#13 [ffffb80edbf37cf8] free_unmap_vmap_area at ffffffff9b23bb3b mm/vmalloc.c:764:0 OnePlusOSS#14 [ffffb80edbf37cf8] remove_vm_area at ffffffff9b23bb3b mm/vmalloc.c:1509:0 OnePlusOSS#15 [ffffb80edbf37d18] __vunmap at ffffffff9b23bb8a mm/vmalloc.c:1537:0 OnePlusOSS#16 [ffffb80edbf37d40] vfree at ffffffff9b23bc85 mm/vmalloc.c:1612:0 OnePlusOSS#17 [ffffb80edbf37d58] megasas_free_host_crash_buffer [megaraid_sas] at ffffffffc020b7f2 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c:3932:0 OnePlusOSS#18 [ffffb80edbf37d80] fw_crash_state_store [megaraid_sas] at ffffffffc01f804d drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c:3291:0 OnePlusOSS#19 [ffffb80edbf37dc0] dev_attr_store at ffffffff9b56dd7b drivers/base/core.c:758:0 OnePlusOSS#20 [ffffb80edbf37dd0] sysfs_kf_write at ffffffff9b326acf fs/sysfs/file.c:144:0 OnePlusOSS#21 [ffffb80edbf37de0] kernfs_fop_write at ffffffff9b325fd4 fs/kernfs/file.c:316:0 OnePlusOSS#22 [ffffb80edbf37e20] __vfs_write at ffffffff9b29418a fs/read_write.c:480:0 OnePlusOSS#23 [ffffb80edbf37ea8] vfs_write at ffffffff9b294462 fs/read_write.c:544:0 OnePlusOSS#24 [ffffb80edbf37ee8] SYSC_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:590:0 OnePlusOSS#25 [ffffb80edbf37ee8] SyS_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:582:0 OnePlusOSS#26 [ffffb80edbf37f30] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9b003ca9 arch/x86/entry/common.c:298:0 OnePlusOSS#27 [ffffb80edbf37f58] entry_SYSCALL_64 at ffffffff9ba001b1 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:238:0 PID: 17355 TASK: ffff95c1090c3d80 CPU: 29 COMMAND: "mrdiagd" !# 0 [ffffb80f2d3c7d30] __read_once_size at ffffffff9b0f2ab0 include/linux/compiler.h:185:0 !# 1 [ffffb80f2d3c7d30] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff9b0f2ab0 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:368:0 # 2 [ffffb80f2d3c7d58] pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff9b0f244b arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:674:0 # 3 [ffffb80f2d3c7d58] queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff9b0f244b arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:53:0 # 4 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] queued_spin_lock at ffffffff9b8961a6 include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:90:0 # 5 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] do_raw_spin_lock_flags at ffffffff9b8961a6 include/linux/spinlock.h:173:0 # 6 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] __raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff9b8961a6 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:122:0 # 7 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff9b8961a6 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160:0 # 8 [ffffb80f2d3c7d88] fw_crash_buffer_store [megaraid_sas] at ffffffffc01f8129 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c:3205:0 # 9 [ffffb80f2d3c7dc0] dev_attr_store at ffffffff9b56dd7b drivers/base/core.c:758:0 OnePlusOSS#10 [ffffb80f2d3c7dd0] sysfs_kf_write at ffffffff9b326acf fs/sysfs/file.c:144:0 OnePlusOSS#11 [ffffb80f2d3c7de0] kernfs_fop_write at ffffffff9b325fd4 fs/kernfs/file.c:316:0 OnePlusOSS#12 [ffffb80f2d3c7e20] __vfs_write at ffffffff9b29418a fs/read_write.c:480:0 OnePlusOSS#13 [ffffb80f2d3c7ea8] vfs_write at ffffffff9b294462 fs/read_write.c:544:0 OnePlusOSS#14 [ffffb80f2d3c7ee8] SYSC_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:590:0 OnePlusOSS#15 [ffffb80f2d3c7ee8] SyS_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:582:0 OnePlusOSS#16 [ffffb80f2d3c7f30] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9b003ca9 arch/x86/entry/common.c:298:0 OnePlusOSS#17 [ffffb80f2d3c7f58] entry_SYSCALL_64 at ffffffff9ba001b1 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:238:0 The lock is used to synchronize different sysfs operations, it doesn't protect any resource that will be touched by an interrupt. Consequently it's not required to disable IRQs. Replace the spinlock with a mutex to fix the deadlock. Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2023
[ Upstream commit a154f5f643c6ecddd44847217a7a3845b4350003 ] The following call trace shows a deadlock issue due to recursive locking of mutex "device_mutex". First lock acquire is in target_for_each_device() and second in target_free_device(). PID: 148266 TASK: ffff8be21ffb5d00 CPU: 10 COMMAND: "iscsi_ttx" #0 [ffffa2bfc9ec3b18] __schedule at ffffffffa8060e7f OnePlusOSS#1 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ba0] schedule at ffffffffa8061224 OnePlusOSS#2 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bb8] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa80615ee OnePlusOSS#3 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bc8] __mutex_lock at ffffffffa8062fd7 OnePlusOSS#4 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c40] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffffa80631d3 OnePlusOSS#5 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c50] mutex_lock at ffffffffa806320c OnePlusOSS#6 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c68] target_free_device at ffffffffc0935998 [target_core_mod] OnePlusOSS#7 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c90] target_core_dev_release at ffffffffc092f975 [target_core_mod] OnePlusOSS#8 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ca0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d250f OnePlusOSS#9 [ffffa2bfc9ec3cd0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d2583 OnePlusOSS#10 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ce0] target_devices_idr_iter at ffffffffc0933f3a [target_core_mod] OnePlusOSS#11 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d00] idr_for_each at ffffffffa803f6fc OnePlusOSS#12 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d60] target_for_each_device at ffffffffc0935670 [target_core_mod] OnePlusOSS#13 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d98] transport_deregister_session at ffffffffc0946408 [target_core_mod] OnePlusOSS#14 [ffffa2bfc9ec3dc8] iscsit_close_session at ffffffffc09a44a6 [iscsi_target_mod] OnePlusOSS#15 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df0] iscsit_close_connection at ffffffffc09a4a88 [iscsi_target_mod] OnePlusOSS#16 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df8] finish_task_switch at ffffffffa76e5d07 OnePlusOSS#17 [ffffa2bfc9ec3e78] iscsit_take_action_for_connection_exit at ffffffffc0991c23 [iscsi_target_mod] OnePlusOSS#18 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ea0] iscsi_target_tx_thread at ffffffffc09a403b [iscsi_target_mod] OnePlusOSS#19 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f08] kthread at ffffffffa76d8080 OnePlusOSS#20 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffa8200364 Fixes: 36d4cb4 ("scsi: target: Avoid that EXTENDED COPY commands trigger lock inversion") Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The Android Material ripple effect on selectable items in recyclerviews is to be triggered when selected, not when dragging to scroll.
It has not been implemented right. Doesn't happen on other phones.
This is noticed on several apps, like Facebook, but also on Oneplus own system apps, like Settings., for instance.
It is mostly noticed on dark mode.
When scrolling we are touching to move, not touching to select.
Result: very annoying constant flickering effect!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jm36onjlml8j9oq/IMG_3636.MOV
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: