4.9.110 or 4.9.113 kernel source? #10
Comments
|
Or likewise, update the kernel being shipped with OOS 11 to reflect this repository as right now this constitutes a rather inexplicable GPL violation. |
|
@binson-xu There is still a mismatch. OSS has 4.19.113, yet stable ships with 4.19.110.
Can you please comply with GPL and upload actual sources? Thank you |
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2022
[ Upstream commit 4224cfd7fb6523f7a9d1c8bb91bb5df1e38eb624 ]
When bringing down the netdevice or system shutdown, a panic can be
triggered while accessing the sysfs path because the device is already
removed.
[ 755.549084] mlx5_core 0000:12:00.1: Shutdown was called
[ 756.404455] mlx5_core 0000:12:00.0: Shutdown was called
...
[ 757.937260] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
[ 758.031397] IP: [<ffffffff8ee11acb>] dma_pool_alloc+0x1ab/0x280
crash> bt
...
PID: 12649 TASK: ffff8924108f2100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "amsd"
...
OnePlusOSS#9 [ffff89240e1a38b0] page_fault at ffffffff8f38c778
[exception RIP: dma_pool_alloc+0x1ab]
RIP: ffffffff8ee11acb RSP: ffff89240e1a3968 RFLAGS: 00010046
RAX: 0000000000000246 RBX: ffff89243d874100 RCX: 0000000000001000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000246 RDI: ffff89243d874090
RBP: ffff89240e1a39c0 R8: 000000000001f080 R9: ffff8905ffc03c00
R10: ffffffffc04680d4 R11: ffffffff8edde9fd R12: 00000000000080d0
R13: ffff89243d874090 R14: ffff89243d874080 R15: 0000000000000000
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
OnePlusOSS#10 [ffff89240e1a39c8] mlx5_alloc_cmd_msg at ffffffffc04680f3 [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#11 [ffff89240e1a3a18] cmd_exec at ffffffffc046ad62 [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#12 [ffff89240e1a3ab8] mlx5_cmd_exec at ffffffffc046b4fb [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#13 [ffff89240e1a3ae8] mlx5_core_access_reg at ffffffffc0475434 [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#14 [ffff89240e1a3b40] mlx5e_get_fec_caps at ffffffffc04a7348 [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#15 [ffff89240e1a3bb0] get_fec_supported_advertised at ffffffffc04992bf [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#16 [ffff89240e1a3c08] mlx5e_get_link_ksettings at ffffffffc049ab36 [mlx5_core]
OnePlusOSS#17 [ffff89240e1a3ce8] __ethtool_get_link_ksettings at ffffffff8f25db46
OnePlusOSS#18 [ffff89240e1a3d48] speed_show at ffffffff8f277208
OnePlusOSS#19 [ffff89240e1a3dd8] dev_attr_show at ffffffff8f0b70e3
OnePlusOSS#20 [ffff89240e1a3df8] sysfs_kf_seq_show at ffffffff8eedbedf
OnePlusOSS#21 [ffff89240e1a3e18] kernfs_seq_show at ffffffff8eeda596
OnePlusOSS#22 [ffff89240e1a3e28] seq_read at ffffffff8ee76d10
OnePlusOSS#23 [ffff89240e1a3e98] kernfs_fop_read at ffffffff8eedaef5
OnePlusOSS#24 [ffff89240e1a3ed8] vfs_read at ffffffff8ee4e3ff
OnePlusOSS#25 [ffff89240e1a3f08] sys_read at ffffffff8ee4f27f
OnePlusOSS#26 [ffff89240e1a3f50] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff8f395f92
crash> net_device.state ffff89443b0c0000
state = 0x5 (__LINK_STATE_START| __LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER)
To prevent this scenario, we also make sure that the netdevice is present.
Signed-off-by: suresh kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jul 1, 2022
[ Upstream commit 6b9dbedbe3499fef862c4dff5217cf91f34e43b3 ]
pty_write() invokes kmalloc() which may invoke a normal printk() to print
failure message. This can cause a deadlock in the scenario reported by
syz-bot below:
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2
---- ---- ----
lock(console_owner);
lock(&port_lock_key);
lock(&port->lock);
lock(&port_lock_key);
lock(&port->lock);
lock(console_owner);
As commit dbdda84 ("printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to
load balance console writes") said, such deadlock can be prevented by
using printk_deferred() in kmalloc() (which is invoked in the section
guarded by the port->lock). But there are too many printk() on the
kmalloc() path, and kmalloc() can be called from anywhere, so changing
printk() to printk_deferred() is too complicated and inelegant.
Therefore, this patch chooses to specify __GFP_NOWARN to kmalloc(), so
that printk() will not be called, and this deadlock problem can be
avoided.
Syzbot reported the following lockdep error:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.4.143-00237-g08ccc19a-dirty OnePlusOSS#10 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.4/29420 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8aedb2a0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_trylock_spinning kernel/printk/printk.c:1752 [inline]
ffffffff8aedb2a0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x2ca/0x470 kernel/printk/printk.c:2023
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880119c9158 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: pty_write+0xf4/0x1f0 drivers/tty/pty.c:120
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> OnePlusOSS#2 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
tty_port_tty_get drivers/tty/tty_port.c:288 [inline] <-- lock(&port->lock);
tty_port_default_wakeup+0x1d/0xb0 drivers/tty/tty_port.c:47
serial8250_tx_chars+0x530/0xa80 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1767
serial8250_handle_irq.part.0+0x31f/0x3d0 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1854
serial8250_handle_irq drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1827 [inline] <-- lock(&port_lock_key);
serial8250_default_handle_irq+0xb2/0x220 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1870
serial8250_interrupt+0xfd/0x200 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:126
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x109/0xa50 kernel/irq/handle.c:156
[...]
-> OnePlusOSS#1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}-{2:2}:
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
serial8250_console_write+0x184/0xa40 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:3198
<-- lock(&port_lock_key);
call_console_drivers kernel/printk/printk.c:1819 [inline]
console_unlock+0x8cb/0xd00 kernel/printk/printk.c:2504
vprintk_emit+0x1b5/0x470 kernel/printk/printk.c:2024 <-- lock(console_owner);
vprintk_func+0x8d/0x250 kernel/printk/printk_safe.c:394
printk+0xba/0xed kernel/printk/printk.c:2084
register_console+0x8b3/0xc10 kernel/printk/printk.c:2829
univ8250_console_init+0x3a/0x46 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:681
console_init+0x49d/0x6d3 kernel/printk/printk.c:2915
start_kernel+0x5e9/0x879 init/main.c:713
secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:241
-> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}:
[...]
lock_acquire+0x127/0x340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4734
console_trylock_spinning kernel/printk/printk.c:1773 [inline] <-- lock(console_owner);
vprintk_emit+0x307/0x470 kernel/printk/printk.c:2023
vprintk_func+0x8d/0x250 kernel/printk/printk_safe.c:394
printk+0xba/0xed kernel/printk/printk.c:2084
fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:45 [inline]
should_fail+0x67b/0x7c0 lib/fault-inject.c:144
__should_failslab+0x152/0x1c0 mm/failslab.c:33
should_failslab+0x5/0x10 mm/slab_common.c:1224
slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:468 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2723 [inline]
slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2807 [inline]
__kmalloc+0x72/0x300 mm/slub.c:3871
kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:582 [inline]
tty_buffer_alloc+0x23f/0x2a0 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:175
__tty_buffer_request_room+0x156/0x2a0 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:273
tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag+0x93/0x250 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:318
tty_insert_flip_string include/linux/tty_flip.h:37 [inline]
pty_write+0x126/0x1f0 drivers/tty/pty.c:122 <-- lock(&port->lock);
n_tty_write+0xa7a/0xfc0 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2356
do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:961 [inline]
tty_write+0x512/0x930 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1045
__vfs_write+0x76/0x100 fs/read_write.c:494
[...]
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &port->lock
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: b6da31b ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag")
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2022
A transaction of type BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_HANDLE can fail to increment the reference for a node. In this case, the target proc normally releases the failed reference upon close as expected. However, if the target is dying in parallel the call will race with binder_deferred_release(), so the target could have released all of its references by now leaving the cleanup of the new failed reference unhandled. The transaction then ends and the target proc gets released making the ref->proc now a dangling pointer. Later on, ref->node is closed and we attempt to take spin_lock(&ref->proc->inner_lock), which leads to the use-after-free bug reported below. Let's fix this by cleaning up the failed reference on the spot instead of relying on the target to do so. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0x150 Write of size 4 at addr ffff5ca207094238 by task kworker/1:0/590 CPU: 1 PID: 590 Comm: kworker/1:0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8 OnePlusOSS#10 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: events binder_deferred_func Call trace: dump_backtrace.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e0 show_stack+0x18/0x70 dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 print_report+0x2e4/0x61c kasan_report+0xa4/0x110 kasan_check_range+0xfc/0x1a4 __kasan_check_write+0x3c/0x50 _raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0x150 binder_deferred_func+0x5e0/0x9b0 process_one_work+0x38c/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x9c/0x694 kthread+0x188/0x190 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <[email protected]> Acked-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <[email protected]> Bug: 239630375 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <[email protected]> Change-Id: I5085dd0dc805a780a64c057e5819f82dd8f02868 (cherry picked from commit ae3fa5d16a02ba7c7b170e0e1ab56d6f0ba33964)
andreock
referenced
this issue
in andreock/android_kernel_realme_sm8250
Aug 31, 2022
[ Upstream commit c5c97cadd7ed13381cb6b4bef5c841a66938d350 ]
The ubsan reported the following error. It was because sample's raw
data missed u32 padding at the end. So it broke the alignment of the
array after it.
The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have
an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data.
27: Sample parsing :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4:
runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type
'__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment
0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here
00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
^
#0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13
#1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8
#2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9
#3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9
#4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9
#5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4
#6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9
#7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11
#8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8
#9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2
#10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3
#11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc)
#12 0x561532596828 in _start ...
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use
util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in
Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
andreock
referenced
this issue
in andreock/android_kernel_realme_sm8250
Sep 1, 2022
This patch is to fix a crash: #3 [ffffb6580689f898] oops_end at ffffffffa2835bc2 #4 [ffffb6580689f8b8] no_context at ffffffffa28766e7 #5 [ffffb6580689f920] async_page_fault at ffffffffa320135e [exception RIP: f2fs_is_compressed_page+34] RIP: ffffffffa2ba83a2 RSP: ffffb6580689f9d8 RFLAGS: 00010213 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: fffffc0f50b34bc0 RCX: 0000000000002122 RDX: 0000000000002123 RSI: 0000000000000c00 RDI: fffffc0f50b34bc0 RBP: ffff97e815a40178 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: ffff97e83ffc9000 R10: 0000000000032300 R11: 0000000000032380 R12: ffffb6580689fa38 R13: fffffc0f50b34bc0 R14: ffff97e825cbd000 R15: 0000000000000c00 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #6 [ffffb6580689f9d8] __is_cp_guaranteed at ffffffffa2b7ea98 #7 [ffffb6580689f9f0] f2fs_submit_page_write at ffffffffa2b81a69 #8 [ffffb6580689fa30] f2fs_do_write_meta_page at ffffffffa2b99777 #9 [ffffb6580689fae0] __f2fs_write_meta_page at ffffffffa2b75f1a #10 [ffffb6580689fb18] f2fs_sync_meta_pages at ffffffffa2b77466 #11 [ffffb6580689fc98] do_checkpoint at ffffffffa2b78e46 #12 [ffffb6580689fd88] f2fs_write_checkpoint at ffffffffa2b79c29 #13 [ffffb6580689fdd0] f2fs_sync_fs at ffffffffa2b69d95 #14 [ffffb6580689fe20] sync_filesystem at ffffffffa2ad2574 #15 [ffffb6580689fe30] generic_shutdown_super at ffffffffa2a9b582 #16 [ffffb6580689fe48] kill_block_super at ffffffffa2a9b6d1 OnePlusOSS#17 [ffffb6580689fe60] kill_f2fs_super at ffffffffa2b6abe1 OnePlusOSS#18 [ffffb6580689fea0] deactivate_locked_super at ffffffffa2a9afb6 OnePlusOSS#19 [ffffb6580689feb8] cleanup_mnt at ffffffffa2abcad4 OnePlusOSS#20 [ffffb6580689fee0] task_work_run at ffffffffa28bca28 OnePlusOSS#21 [ffffb6580689ff00] exit_to_usermode_loop at ffffffffa28050b7 OnePlusOSS#22 [ffffb6580689ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa280560e OnePlusOSS#23 [ffffb6580689ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa320008c This occurred when umount f2fs if enable F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION with F2FS_IO_TRACE. Fixes it by adding IS_IO_TRACED_PAGE to check validity of pid for page_private. Signed-off-by: Yu Changchun <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
andreock
referenced
this issue
in andreock/android_kernel_realme_sm8250
Sep 1, 2022
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565 PID: 257 TASK: ecdd0000 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "init" #0 [<c0b420ec>] (__schedule) from [<c0b423c8>] #1 [<c0b423c8>] (schedule) from [<c0b459d4>] #2 [<c0b459d4>] (rwsem_down_read_failed) from [<c0b44fa0>] #3 [<c0b44fa0>] (down_read) from [<c044233c>] #4 [<c044233c>] (f2fs_truncate_blocks) from [<c0442890>] #5 [<c0442890>] (f2fs_truncate) from [<c044d408>] #6 [<c044d408>] (f2fs_evict_inode) from [<c030be18>] #7 [<c030be18>] (evict) from [<c030a558>] #8 [<c030a558>] (iput) from [<c047c600>] #9 [<c047c600>] (f2fs_sync_node_pages) from [<c0465414>] #10 [<c0465414>] (f2fs_write_checkpoint) from [<c04575f4>] #11 [<c04575f4>] (f2fs_sync_fs) from [<c0441918>] #12 [<c0441918>] (f2fs_do_sync_file) from [<c0441098>] #13 [<c0441098>] (f2fs_sync_file) from [<c0323fa0>] #14 [<c0323fa0>] (vfs_fsync_range) from [<c0324294>] #15 [<c0324294>] (do_fsync) from [<c0324014>] #16 [<c0324014>] (sys_fsync) from [<c0108bc0>] This can be caused by flush_dirty_inode() in f2fs_sync_node_pages() where iput() requires f2fs_lock_op() again resulting in livelock. Reported-by: Zhiguo Niu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
andreock
referenced
this issue
in andreock/android_kernel_realme_sm8250
Sep 1, 2022
…tances As syzbot reported, there is an use-after-free issue during f2fs recovery: Use-after-free write at 0xffff88823bc16040 (in kfence-#10): kmem_cache_destroy+0x1f/0x120 mm/slab_common.c:486 f2fs_recover_fsync_data+0x75b0/0x8380 fs/f2fs/recovery.c:869 f2fs_fill_super+0x9393/0xa420 fs/f2fs/super.c:3945 mount_bdev+0x26c/0x3a0 fs/super.c:1367 legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592 vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x270 fs/super.c:1497 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2905 [inline] path_mount+0x196f/0x2be0 fs/namespace.c:3235 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3248 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3456 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x2f9/0x3b0 fs/namespace.c:3433 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae The root cause is multi f2fs filesystem instances can race on accessing global fsync_entry_slab pointer, result in use-after-free issue of slab cache, fixes to init/destroy this slab cache only once during module init/destroy procedure to avoid this issue. Reported-by: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2023
commit a0e44c64b6061dda7e00b7c458e4523e2331b739 upstream. A transaction of type BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_HANDLE can fail to increment the reference for a node. In this case, the target proc normally releases the failed reference upon close as expected. However, if the target is dying in parallel the call will race with binder_deferred_release(), so the target could have released all of its references by now leaving the cleanup of the new failed reference unhandled. The transaction then ends and the target proc gets released making the ref->proc now a dangling pointer. Later on, ref->node is closed and we attempt to take spin_lock(&ref->proc->inner_lock), which leads to the use-after-free bug reported below. Let's fix this by cleaning up the failed reference on the spot instead of relying on the target to do so. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0x150 Write of size 4 at addr ffff5ca207094238 by task kworker/1:0/590 CPU: 1 PID: 590 Comm: kworker/1:0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8 OnePlusOSS#10 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: events binder_deferred_func Call trace: dump_backtrace.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e0 show_stack+0x18/0x70 dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 print_report+0x2e4/0x61c kasan_report+0xa4/0x110 kasan_check_range+0xfc/0x1a4 __kasan_check_write+0x3c/0x50 _raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0x150 binder_deferred_func+0x5e0/0x9b0 process_one_work+0x38c/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x9c/0x694 kthread+0x188/0x190 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Acked-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <[email protected]> Cc: stable <[email protected]> # 4.14+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2023
A transaction of type BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_HANDLE can fail to increment the reference for a node. In this case, the target proc normally releases the failed reference upon close as expected. However, if the target is dying in parallel the call will race with binder_deferred_release(), so the target could have released all of its references by now leaving the cleanup of the new failed reference unhandled. The transaction then ends and the target proc gets released making the ref->proc now a dangling pointer. Later on, ref->node is closed and we attempt to take spin_lock(&ref->proc->inner_lock), which leads to the use-after-free bug reported below. Let's fix this by cleaning up the failed reference on the spot instead of relying on the target to do so. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0x150 Write of size 4 at addr ffff5ca207094238 by task kworker/1:0/590 CPU: 1 PID: 590 Comm: kworker/1:0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8 OnePlusOSS#10 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: events binder_deferred_func Call trace: dump_backtrace.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e0 show_stack+0x18/0x70 dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 print_report+0x2e4/0x61c kasan_report+0xa4/0x110 kasan_check_range+0xfc/0x1a4 __kasan_check_write+0x3c/0x50 _raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0x150 binder_deferred_func+0x5e0/0x9b0 process_one_work+0x38c/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x9c/0x694 kthread+0x188/0x190 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <[email protected]> Acked-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <[email protected]> Bug: 239630375 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <[email protected]> Change-Id: I5085dd0dc805a780a64c057e5819f82dd8f02868 (cherry picked from commit ae3fa5d16a02ba7c7b170e0e1ab56d6f0ba33964) Git-commit: 70f060f Git-repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common Signed-off-by: PavanKumar S.R <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jan 19, 2023
…g the sock [ Upstream commit 3cf7203ca620682165706f70a1b12b5194607dce ] There is a race condition in vxlan that when deleting a vxlan device during receiving packets, there is a possibility that the sock is released after getting vxlan_sock vs from sk_user_data. Then in later vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(), vxlan_get_sk_family() we will got NULL pointer dereference. e.g. #0 [ffffa25ec6978a38] machine_kexec at ffffffff8c669757 OnePlusOSS#1 [ffffa25ec6978a90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c0a4d OnePlusOSS#2 [ffffa25ec6978b58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c1c48 OnePlusOSS#3 [ffffa25ec6978b60] oops_end at ffffffff8c627f2b OnePlusOSS#4 [ffffa25ec6978b80] page_fault_oops at ffffffff8c678fcb OnePlusOSS#5 [ffffa25ec6978bd8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d109542 OnePlusOSS#6 [ffffa25ec6978c00] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d200b62 [exception RIP: vxlan_ecn_decapsulate+0x3b] RIP: ffffffffc1014e7b RSP: ffffa25ec6978cb0 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8aa000888000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffff8a9fc7ab803e RDI: ffff8a9fd1168700 RBP: ffff8a9fc7ab803e R8: 0000000000700000 R9: 00000000000010ae R10: ffff8a9fcb748980 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a9fd1168700 R13: ffff8aa000888000 R14: 00000000002a0000 R15: 00000000000010ae ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 OnePlusOSS#7 [ffffa25ec6978ce8] vxlan_rcv at ffffffffc10189cd [vxlan] OnePlusOSS#8 [ffffa25ec6978d90] udp_queue_rcv_one_skb at ffffffff8cfb6507 OnePlusOSS#9 [ffffa25ec6978dc0] udp_unicast_rcv_skb at ffffffff8cfb6e45 OnePlusOSS#10 [ffffa25ec6978dc8] __udp4_lib_rcv at ffffffff8cfb8807 OnePlusOSS#11 [ffffa25ec6978e20] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu at ffffffff8cf76951 OnePlusOSS#12 [ffffa25ec6978e48] ip_local_deliver at ffffffff8cf76bde OnePlusOSS#13 [ffffa25ec6978ea0] __netif_receive_skb_one_core at ffffffff8cecde9b OnePlusOSS#14 [ffffa25ec6978ec8] process_backlog at ffffffff8cece139 OnePlusOSS#15 [ffffa25ec6978f00] __napi_poll at ffffffff8ceced1a OnePlusOSS#16 [ffffa25ec6978f28] net_rx_action at ffffffff8cecf1f3 OnePlusOSS#17 [ffffa25ec6978fa0] __softirqentry_text_start at ffffffff8d4000ca OnePlusOSS#18 [ffffa25ec6978ff0] do_softirq at ffffffff8c6fbdc3 Reproducer: https://github.com/Mellanox/ovs-tests/blob/master/test-ovs-vxlan-remove-tunnel-during-traffic.sh Fix this by waiting for all sk_user_data reader to finish before releasing the sock. Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> Fixes: 6a93cc9 ("udp-tunnel: Add a few more UDP tunnel APIs") Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
sreelekshman
pushed a commit
to sreelekshman/android_kernel_realme_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2023
[ Upstream commit 05bb0167c80b8f93c6a4e0451b7da9b96db990c2 ] ACPICA commit 770653e3ba67c30a629ca7d12e352d83c2541b1e Before this change we see the following UBSAN stack trace in Fuchsia: #0 0x000021e4213b3302 in acpi_ds_init_aml_walk(struct acpi_walk_state*, union acpi_parse_object*, struct acpi_namespace_node*, u8*, u32, struct acpi_evaluate_info*, u8) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/dispatcher/dswstate.c:682 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x233302 realme-sm8250-devs#1.2 0x000020d0f660777f in ubsan_get_stack_trace() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:41 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x3d77f realme-sm8250-devs#1.1 0x000020d0f660777f in maybe_print_stack_trace() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:51 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x3d77f realme-sm8250-devs#1 0x000020d0f660777f in ~scoped_report() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:387 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x3d77f realme-sm8250-devs#2 0x000020d0f660b96d in handlepointer_overflow_impl() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:809 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x4196d realme-sm8250-devs#3 0x000020d0f660b50d in compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:815 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x4150d OnePlusOSS#4 0x000021e4213b3302 in acpi_ds_init_aml_walk(struct acpi_walk_state*, union acpi_parse_object*, struct acpi_namespace_node*, u8*, u32, struct acpi_evaluate_info*, u8) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/dispatcher/dswstate.c:682 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x233302 OnePlusOSS#5 0x000021e4213e2369 in acpi_ds_call_control_method(struct acpi_thread_state*, struct acpi_walk_state*, union acpi_parse_object*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/dispatcher/dsmethod.c:605 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x262369 OnePlusOSS#6 0x000021e421437fac in acpi_ps_parse_aml(struct acpi_walk_state*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/parser/psparse.c:550 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2b7fac OnePlusOSS#7 0x000021e4214464d2 in acpi_ps_execute_method(struct acpi_evaluate_info*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/parser/psxface.c:244 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2c64d2 OnePlusOSS#8 0x000021e4213aa052 in acpi_ns_evaluate(struct acpi_evaluate_info*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nseval.c:250 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x22a052 OnePlusOSS#9 0x000021e421413dd8 in acpi_ns_init_one_device(acpi_handle, u32, void*, void**) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nsinit.c:735 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x293dd8 OnePlusOSS#10 0x000021e421429e98 in acpi_ns_walk_namespace(acpi_object_type, acpi_handle, u32, u32, acpi_walk_callback, acpi_walk_callback, void*, void**) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nswalk.c:298 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2a9e98 OnePlusOSS#11 0x000021e4214131ac in acpi_ns_initialize_devices(u32) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nsinit.c:268 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2931ac OnePlusOSS#12 0x000021e42147c40d in acpi_initialize_objects(u32) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/utilities/utxfinit.c:304 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2fc40d OnePlusOSS#13 0x000021e42126d603 in acpi::acpi_impl::initialize_acpi(acpi::acpi_impl*) ../../src/devices/board/lib/acpi/acpi-impl.cc:224 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0xed603 Add a simple check that avoids incrementing a pointer by zero, but otherwise behaves as before. Note that our findings are against ACPICA 20221020, but the same code exists on master. Link: acpica/acpica@770653e3 Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2023
[ Upstream commit 0b0747d507bffb827e40fc0f9fb5883fffc23477 ] The following processes run into a deadlock. CPU 41 was waiting for CPU 29 to handle a CSD request while holding spinlock "crashdump_lock", but CPU 29 was hung by that spinlock with IRQs disabled. PID: 17360 TASK: ffff95c1090c5c40 CPU: 41 COMMAND: "mrdiagd" !# 0 [ffffb80edbf37b58] __read_once_size at ffffffff9b871a40 include/linux/compiler.h:185:0 !# 1 [ffffb80edbf37b58] atomic_read at ffffffff9b871a40 arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:27:0 !# 2 [ffffb80edbf37b58] dump_stack at ffffffff9b871a40 lib/dump_stack.c:54:0 # 3 [ffffb80edbf37b78] csd_lock_wait_toolong at ffffffff9b131ad5 kernel/smp.c:364:0 # 4 [ffffb80edbf37b78] __csd_lock_wait at ffffffff9b131ad5 kernel/smp.c:384:0 # 5 [ffffb80edbf37bf8] csd_lock_wait at ffffffff9b13267a kernel/smp.c:394:0 # 6 [ffffb80edbf37bf8] smp_call_function_many at ffffffff9b13267a kernel/smp.c:843:0 # 7 [ffffb80edbf37c50] smp_call_function at ffffffff9b13279d kernel/smp.c:867:0 # 8 [ffffb80edbf37c50] on_each_cpu at ffffffff9b13279d kernel/smp.c:976:0 # 9 [ffffb80edbf37c78] flush_tlb_kernel_range at ffffffff9b085c4b arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:742:0 OnePlusOSS#10 [ffffb80edbf37cb8] __purge_vmap_area_lazy at ffffffff9b23a1e0 mm/vmalloc.c:701:0 OnePlusOSS#11 [ffffb80edbf37ce0] try_purge_vmap_area_lazy at ffffffff9b23a2cc mm/vmalloc.c:722:0 OnePlusOSS#12 [ffffb80edbf37ce0] free_vmap_area_noflush at ffffffff9b23a2cc mm/vmalloc.c:754:0 OnePlusOSS#13 [ffffb80edbf37cf8] free_unmap_vmap_area at ffffffff9b23bb3b mm/vmalloc.c:764:0 OnePlusOSS#14 [ffffb80edbf37cf8] remove_vm_area at ffffffff9b23bb3b mm/vmalloc.c:1509:0 OnePlusOSS#15 [ffffb80edbf37d18] __vunmap at ffffffff9b23bb8a mm/vmalloc.c:1537:0 OnePlusOSS#16 [ffffb80edbf37d40] vfree at ffffffff9b23bc85 mm/vmalloc.c:1612:0 OnePlusOSS#17 [ffffb80edbf37d58] megasas_free_host_crash_buffer [megaraid_sas] at ffffffffc020b7f2 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c:3932:0 OnePlusOSS#18 [ffffb80edbf37d80] fw_crash_state_store [megaraid_sas] at ffffffffc01f804d drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c:3291:0 OnePlusOSS#19 [ffffb80edbf37dc0] dev_attr_store at ffffffff9b56dd7b drivers/base/core.c:758:0 OnePlusOSS#20 [ffffb80edbf37dd0] sysfs_kf_write at ffffffff9b326acf fs/sysfs/file.c:144:0 OnePlusOSS#21 [ffffb80edbf37de0] kernfs_fop_write at ffffffff9b325fd4 fs/kernfs/file.c:316:0 OnePlusOSS#22 [ffffb80edbf37e20] __vfs_write at ffffffff9b29418a fs/read_write.c:480:0 OnePlusOSS#23 [ffffb80edbf37ea8] vfs_write at ffffffff9b294462 fs/read_write.c:544:0 OnePlusOSS#24 [ffffb80edbf37ee8] SYSC_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:590:0 OnePlusOSS#25 [ffffb80edbf37ee8] SyS_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:582:0 OnePlusOSS#26 [ffffb80edbf37f30] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9b003ca9 arch/x86/entry/common.c:298:0 OnePlusOSS#27 [ffffb80edbf37f58] entry_SYSCALL_64 at ffffffff9ba001b1 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:238:0 PID: 17355 TASK: ffff95c1090c3d80 CPU: 29 COMMAND: "mrdiagd" !# 0 [ffffb80f2d3c7d30] __read_once_size at ffffffff9b0f2ab0 include/linux/compiler.h:185:0 !# 1 [ffffb80f2d3c7d30] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff9b0f2ab0 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:368:0 # 2 [ffffb80f2d3c7d58] pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff9b0f244b arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:674:0 # 3 [ffffb80f2d3c7d58] queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff9b0f244b arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:53:0 # 4 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] queued_spin_lock at ffffffff9b8961a6 include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:90:0 # 5 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] do_raw_spin_lock_flags at ffffffff9b8961a6 include/linux/spinlock.h:173:0 # 6 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] __raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff9b8961a6 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:122:0 # 7 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff9b8961a6 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160:0 # 8 [ffffb80f2d3c7d88] fw_crash_buffer_store [megaraid_sas] at ffffffffc01f8129 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c:3205:0 # 9 [ffffb80f2d3c7dc0] dev_attr_store at ffffffff9b56dd7b drivers/base/core.c:758:0 OnePlusOSS#10 [ffffb80f2d3c7dd0] sysfs_kf_write at ffffffff9b326acf fs/sysfs/file.c:144:0 OnePlusOSS#11 [ffffb80f2d3c7de0] kernfs_fop_write at ffffffff9b325fd4 fs/kernfs/file.c:316:0 OnePlusOSS#12 [ffffb80f2d3c7e20] __vfs_write at ffffffff9b29418a fs/read_write.c:480:0 OnePlusOSS#13 [ffffb80f2d3c7ea8] vfs_write at ffffffff9b294462 fs/read_write.c:544:0 OnePlusOSS#14 [ffffb80f2d3c7ee8] SYSC_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:590:0 OnePlusOSS#15 [ffffb80f2d3c7ee8] SyS_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:582:0 OnePlusOSS#16 [ffffb80f2d3c7f30] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9b003ca9 arch/x86/entry/common.c:298:0 OnePlusOSS#17 [ffffb80f2d3c7f58] entry_SYSCALL_64 at ffffffff9ba001b1 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:238:0 The lock is used to synchronize different sysfs operations, it doesn't protect any resource that will be touched by an interrupt. Consequently it's not required to disable IRQs. Replace the spinlock with a mutex to fix the deadlock. Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2023
[ Upstream commit a154f5f643c6ecddd44847217a7a3845b4350003 ] The following call trace shows a deadlock issue due to recursive locking of mutex "device_mutex". First lock acquire is in target_for_each_device() and second in target_free_device(). PID: 148266 TASK: ffff8be21ffb5d00 CPU: 10 COMMAND: "iscsi_ttx" #0 [ffffa2bfc9ec3b18] __schedule at ffffffffa8060e7f OnePlusOSS#1 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ba0] schedule at ffffffffa8061224 OnePlusOSS#2 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bb8] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa80615ee OnePlusOSS#3 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bc8] __mutex_lock at ffffffffa8062fd7 OnePlusOSS#4 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c40] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffffa80631d3 OnePlusOSS#5 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c50] mutex_lock at ffffffffa806320c OnePlusOSS#6 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c68] target_free_device at ffffffffc0935998 [target_core_mod] OnePlusOSS#7 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c90] target_core_dev_release at ffffffffc092f975 [target_core_mod] OnePlusOSS#8 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ca0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d250f OnePlusOSS#9 [ffffa2bfc9ec3cd0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d2583 OnePlusOSS#10 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ce0] target_devices_idr_iter at ffffffffc0933f3a [target_core_mod] OnePlusOSS#11 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d00] idr_for_each at ffffffffa803f6fc OnePlusOSS#12 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d60] target_for_each_device at ffffffffc0935670 [target_core_mod] OnePlusOSS#13 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d98] transport_deregister_session at ffffffffc0946408 [target_core_mod] OnePlusOSS#14 [ffffa2bfc9ec3dc8] iscsit_close_session at ffffffffc09a44a6 [iscsi_target_mod] OnePlusOSS#15 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df0] iscsit_close_connection at ffffffffc09a4a88 [iscsi_target_mod] OnePlusOSS#16 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df8] finish_task_switch at ffffffffa76e5d07 OnePlusOSS#17 [ffffa2bfc9ec3e78] iscsit_take_action_for_connection_exit at ffffffffc0991c23 [iscsi_target_mod] OnePlusOSS#18 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ea0] iscsi_target_tx_thread at ffffffffc09a403b [iscsi_target_mod] OnePlusOSS#19 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f08] kthread at ffffffffa76d8080 OnePlusOSS#20 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffa8200364 Fixes: 36d4cb4 ("scsi: target: Avoid that EXTENDED COPY commands trigger lock inversion") Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Dec 23, 2023
[ Upstream commit 719639853d88071dfdfd8d9971eca9c283ff314c ] KMSAN reported the following uninit-value access issue: ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ppp_sync_input drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c:690 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ppp_sync_receive+0xdc9/0xe70 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c:334 ppp_sync_input drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c:690 [inline] ppp_sync_receive+0xdc9/0xe70 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c:334 tiocsti+0x328/0x450 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2295 tty_ioctl+0x808/0x1920 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2694 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x211/0x400 fs/ioctl.c:857 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xe0 fs/ioctl.c:857 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x44/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b Uninit was created at: __alloc_pages+0x75d/0xe80 mm/page_alloc.c:4591 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] __page_frag_cache_refill+0x9a/0x2c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4691 page_frag_alloc_align+0x91/0x5d0 mm/page_alloc.c:4722 page_frag_alloc include/linux/gfp.h:322 [inline] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x215/0x6d0 net/core/skbuff.c:728 netdev_alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:3225 [inline] dev_alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:3238 [inline] ppp_sync_input drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c:669 [inline] ppp_sync_receive+0x237/0xe70 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c:334 tiocsti+0x328/0x450 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2295 tty_ioctl+0x808/0x1920 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2694 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x211/0x400 fs/ioctl.c:857 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xe0 fs/ioctl.c:857 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x44/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b CPU: 0 PID: 12950 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.6.0-14500-g1c41041124bd OnePlusOSS#10 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014 ===================================================== ppp_sync_input() checks the first 2 bytes of the data are PPP_ALLSTATIONS and PPP_UI. However, if the data length is 1 and the first byte is PPP_ALLSTATIONS, an access to an uninitialized value occurs when checking PPP_UI. This patch resolves this issue by checking the data length. Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
schqiushui
pushed a commit
to PixelExperiencePlus/android_kernel_oneplus_sm8250
that referenced
this issue
Dec 23, 2023
[ Upstream commit fb317eb23b5ee4c37b0656a9a52a3db58d9dd072 ] KMSAN reported the following kernel-infoleak issue: ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x4ec/0x2bc0 lib/iov_iter.c:186 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] _copy_to_iter+0x4ec/0x2bc0 lib/iov_iter.c:186 copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:197 [inline] simple_copy_to_iter net/core/datagram.c:532 [inline] __skb_datagram_iter.5+0x148/0xe30 net/core/datagram.c:420 skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x52/0x210 net/core/datagram.c:546 skb_copy_datagram_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:3960 [inline] netlink_recvmsg+0x43d/0x1630 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1967 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1044 [inline] sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:1066 [inline] __sys_recvfrom+0x476/0x860 net/socket.c:2246 __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2264 [inline] __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2260 [inline] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2260 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x44/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook+0x103/0x9e0 mm/slab.h:768 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5f7/0xb50 mm/slub.c:3523 kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:560 __alloc_skb+0x2fd/0x770 net/core/skbuff.c:651 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1286 [inline] tipc_tlv_alloc net/tipc/netlink_compat.c:156 [inline] tipc_get_err_tlv+0x90/0x5d0 net/tipc/netlink_compat.c:170 tipc_nl_compat_recv+0x1042/0x15d0 net/tipc/netlink_compat.c:1324 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:972 [inline] genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1052 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x1220/0x12c0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1067 netlink_rcv_skb+0x4a4/0x6a0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545 genl_rcv+0x41/0x60 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1076 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xf4b/0x1230 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1368 netlink_sendmsg+0x1242/0x1420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x997/0xd60 net/socket.c:2588 ___sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2642 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2671 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2680 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2678 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x2fa/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2678 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x44/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b Bytes 34-35 of 36 are uninitialized Memory access of size 36 starts at ffff88802d464a00 Data copied to user address 00007ff55033c0a0 CPU: 0 PID: 30322 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.6.0-14500-g1c41041124bd OnePlusOSS#10 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014 ===================================================== tipc_add_tlv() puts TLV descriptor and value onto `skb`. This size is calculated with TLV_SPACE() macro. It adds the size of struct tlv_desc and the length of TLV value passed as an argument, and aligns the result to a multiple of TLV_ALIGNTO, i.e., a multiple of 4 bytes. If the size of struct tlv_desc plus the length of TLV value is not aligned, the current implementation leaves the remaining bytes uninitialized. This is the cause of the above kernel-infoleak issue. This patch resolves this issue by clearing data up to an aligned size. Fixes: d0796d1 ("tipc: convert legacy nl bearer dump to nl compat") Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi OnePlus team,
The source you released is based on Linux 4.9.113, but the stock kernel is based on 4.9.110. Why the discrepancy?
Any chance to release the actual source that is used to build the stock kernel?
Thanks,
Kristof
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: