Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does it really take 2 days to evaluate llama-3.1-8b at 128k length? #79

Open
eldarkurtic opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@eldarkurtic
Copy link

Hi,

I am attempting to reproduce the results for the Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model by following the steps provided in the README. Everything is set up within your Docker environment, and I am using vLLM for inference. My setup includes a single H100 GPU with a batch size of 8, as specified in the example scripts.

With this configuration, the runtime for processing a 128k context length (synthetic task) is approximately 2 days. Is this runtime expected? If not, could you please share the configuration or optimizations you used to efficiently handle this context length?

@hsiehjackson
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @eldarkurtic, I don't apply any additional optimizations when running inference. I usually use 8 GPUs with TP=8 using vLLM. It takes around 2 hours to run 128K length with 500 samples for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct.

@eldarkurtic
Copy link
Author

Which batch size are you using?

@hsiehjackson
Copy link
Collaborator

I am using batch size = 1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants