Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Link only required satellite coefficient fix files #343

Open
fossell opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Link only required satellite coefficient fix files #343

fossell opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@fossell
Copy link
Contributor

fossell commented Jul 12, 2021

Is there a way to link in only the desired CRTM satellite fix files for the fields you want to output? Instead of linking in all possible fix files? For example, if we just want to output GOES-16, then only require linking in the abi_gr*.bin files to the working directory. Maybe this capability already exists?
@fossell fossell added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 12, 2021
EricJames-NOAA pushed a commit to EricJames-NOAA/UPP that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2022
@mkavulich
Cherry-pick NOAA-EMC#343 from release branch: Allow running from cron…
b8f9819 
…tab on Cheyenne, as well as fix workflow generation on Cheyenne (NOAA-EMC#378)

## DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES: 
A fix was applied to the release branch for the Cheyenne workflow and automated testing in NOAA-EMC#343, this PR applies the same to develop.

## TESTS CONDUCTED: 
Workflow built and ran on Cheyenne; the following tests were run and all passed:
 - grid_RRFS_CONUS_13km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v15p2
 - grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v15p2
 - grid_RRFS_CONUS_3km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v15p2

## ISSUE (optional): 
Fully resolves NOAA-EMC#326
@fossell
Copy link
Contributor Author

fossell commented May 2, 2023

@gspetro-NOAA, @FernandoAndrade-NOAA - This was an enhancement idea from the DTC team. It's up to you guys to decide if you want to keep this as a potential future enhancement. It's probably still relevant, as far as we know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
EPIC UPP Development
Status: Todo
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@fossell