ϩⲟⲗⲱⲥ misses clickable link to Perseus, should be ὅλοξ

[m-linssen]

A bit of a binary mismatch in Tufts, perhaps.
Observe ὅλοξ, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0058%3Aentry%3Do(%2Floc

III.adv. ὅλως, wholly, altogether, Plat., etc.
2.on the whole, speaking generally, in short, in a word, Like ἑνὶ λόγῳ, Lat. denique, Dem.
3.often with a neg., οὐχ ὅλως not at all, Plat., Xen., etc.

Yet ὅλως as entry doesn't exist, it leads back to ὅλοξ

https://coptic-dictionary.org/entry.cgi?tla=C11156 for your convenience. Thanks!

[amir-zeldes]

From the CDO perspective, several things are going wrong here:

• In the original XML lemma list data from DDGLC, the omicron-spiritus-acute is being realized as combining diacritics in this particular, rather than a single Unicode glyph. @KaJohn-DDGLC or @simondschweitzer can this be resolved in the source data? I think we shouldn't use combining diacritics if possible
• As a work-around, I adjusted the Perseus linking to tolerate combining diacritics for now, but as @m-linssen pointed out, there is no Perseus entry for the adverbial form. Would it be a better idea to link to the adjectival lemma form? This is a general question, above and beyond the diacritic issue.

The current production server now produces a Perseus link at the following page, which from the CDO infrastructure point of view is 'correct', though nothing is found in Perseus:

https://coptic-dictionary.org/entry.cgi?tla=C11156

[m-linssen]

Hi Amir, ὀκνέω is similar, it seems: https://coptic-dictionary.org/entry.cgi?tla=C11039

[amir-zeldes]

Yes, this is a different combining glyph... @KaJohn-DDGLC , before we dig deeper into this on the interface side, would you consider replacing these glyphs with single-code point characters in the XML data?