You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hello!
I have some questions about the Mamba file.
First, in Figure 2, when computing the hidden state for the input $${D1}$$, the first row of $$A'$$ in Figure 1 is transformed into a diagonal matrix for the calculation. This corresponds to the values in Figure 2 for $${D1}$$: $$[1.49, 0.67], [1.41, 0.71], [1.45, 0.69]$$.
However, when computing the hidden state for the inputs $${D2}$$, $${D3}$$ and $${D4}$$, I noticed what seems to be an error. Shouldn't{ $${D2}$$ } { $${T2}$$}, according to the corresponding relationship, result in the diagonal matrix $$[2, 0.71]$$ as shown in Figure 2?
Additionally, thank you for this clear explanation of model expressions!
fig.1 fig.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hello!
I have some questions about the Mamba file.
First, in Figure 2, when computing the hidden state for the input$${D1}$$ , the first row of $$A'$$ in Figure 1 is transformed into a diagonal matrix for the calculation. This corresponds to the values in Figure 2 for $${D1}$$ : $$[1.49, 0.67], [1.41, 0.71], [1.45, 0.69]$$ .
However, when computing the hidden state for the inputs$${D2}$$ , $${D3}$$ and $${D4}$$ , I noticed what seems to be an error. Shouldn't{ $${D2}$$ } { $${T2}$$ }, according to the corresponding relationship, result in the diagonal matrix $$[2, 0.71]$$ as shown in Figure 2?
Additionally, thank you for this clear explanation of model expressions!
fig.1
fig.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: