Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Redesign structure #11

Open
buserp opened this issue Sep 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Redesign structure #11

buserp opened this issue Sep 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-high important T-Tree 2.0 Issues pertaining the the T-Tree 2.0

Comments

@buserp
Copy link
Collaborator

buserp commented Sep 10, 2023 •
edited
Loading

The T-Tree 2.0 changed some physical aspects of the T-Tree 1.0. One of these changes was moving the Brain to the top of the tree, which had the unintended result of needing cables to be run up to the top. This can create strain on the cables and also looks bad.

For the next design (T-Tree 3.0?) we should reconsider where the Brain should be. Additionally, we need to think about how to incorporate the power supply so that it doesn't hang off the body of the T-Tree.

The smaller PVC diameter of the branches also leaves no wiggle room, which can create strain on the T-Sticks themselves. I think going back to the 3" PVC design for the branches would be a good way to go.
@buserp buserp added enhancement New feature or request T-Tree 2.0 Issues pertaining the the T-Tree 2.0 labels Sep 10, 2023
@buserp buserp added the priority-high important label Sep 18, 2023
@buserp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

buserp commented Sep 18, 2023

Related: #5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-high important T-Tree 2.0 Issues pertaining the the T-Tree 2.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@buserp