You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The traits FieldBasedSignatureScheme and FieldBasedVrf where introduced by us for our circuit-friendly variants of the Schnorr Signature (the FieldBasedSchnorrSignature) and our Schnorr-NIZK based VRF.
Regarding FieldBasedSignatureScheme I do not see any reason for having this extra trait. The circuit-friendly Schnorr is just another "normal" signature scheme, and hence comes with no additional/different trait functions.
Similarly for the VRF. I'd opt for introducing a general trait VRF without the "FieldBased".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The traits
FieldBasedSignatureScheme
andFieldBasedVrf
where introduced by us for our circuit-friendly variants of the Schnorr Signature (theFieldBasedSchnorrSignature
) and our Schnorr-NIZK based VRF.Regarding
FieldBasedSignatureScheme
I do not see any reason for having this extra trait. The circuit-friendly Schnorr is just another "normal" signature scheme, and hence comes with no additional/different trait functions.Similarly for the VRF. I'd opt for introducing a general
trait VRF
without the "FieldBased".The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: