Give this a better name

[HenrikJoreteg]

"hjs-webpack" is boring and dull.

a few of my silly ideas (these things that are available on npm)

easier
shades
carefree
helpy
helperton
boat
simpleton
robut
minion

what do you think @lukekarrys?

[HenrikJoreteg]

other ideas:

roar
snore
mindless
mundane

kinda liking: stationary (as in static)

[HenrikJoreteg]

construction is available

[HenrikJoreteg]

maybe: https://www.npmjs.com/package/webpacker

[HenrikJoreteg]

easy-webpack

[jeffboyus]

I like several of these suggested. My only feedback would be not to use a name that infers you may have re-written or forked webpack (easy-webpack). It would be nice to somehow relate that this is a super simple config mechanism for webpack.

[HenrikJoreteg]

suitcase possibly

[lukekarrys]

@HenrikJoreteg I like that 👍

---

Luke Karrys

On Jul 25, 2015, at 9:25 PM, Henrik Joreteg [email protected] wrote:

suitcase possibly

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[basham]

briefcase could be a nice pun. Plays on the idea of packing (Web_pack_). And the setup it affords should be very brief.

[lukekarrys]

oooh I like that one too @basham. What do you think @HenrikJoreteg? I could go for suitcase or briefcase.

[HenrikJoreteg]

i dig it. briefcase is perfect!

[basham]

👍

[chrisvfritz]

👍 for briefcase! I recently demoed this library at a local meetup and it had a very positive reception, but people had trouble remembering the name (I think partly because in the local dialect, HJS sounds a lot like AJS or HAS). I did explain that it stands for Human JavaScript. 😃

[tdd]

Totally 💯 on briefcase :-)

[alejandronanez]

I hate to spam issues with +1. But briefcase is fantastic.

[dmitryverkhovtsev]

webpack-me ?

[standayweb]

briefcase sounds good to me.

[selbekk]

Should we rename, or should we just let this be? I think hjs-webpack has a nice ring to it to be honest, and it's gained a lot of traction under that name.

I suggest we either close this issue or get on renaming it to 💼.