Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About not use Dust3r pretrained model #18

Open
puyiwen opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

About not use Dust3r pretrained model #18

puyiwen opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@puyiwen
Copy link

puyiwen commented Oct 14, 2024

Hi, thank you for your codes! And I want to know not use dust3r pretrained model, how effective is the spann3r? Thank you again!

@HengyiWang
Copy link
Owner

Hi @puyiwen, I have not tried training Spann3R from scratch. It is mostly due to computational constraints and the data. It is worth trying and I guess the performance can be similar if one can train Spann3R on the same amount of high-quality data as in DUSt3R. However, note that training DUSt3R is much more efficient so it is natural to have the trained DUSt3R as a good initialization.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants