From 5a2019add8d3e4688421f2aabc44a9284503bf60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Maciej=20Szyma=C5=84ski?= Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:08:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix table formatting in blog of Ishan Darji --- _gsocblogs/2024/blog_ATLCompression_IshanDarji.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/_gsocblogs/2024/blog_ATLCompression_IshanDarji.md b/_gsocblogs/2024/blog_ATLCompression_IshanDarji.md index e4778f4d4..e3bdab091 100644 --- a/_gsocblogs/2024/blog_ATLCompression_IshanDarji.md +++ b/_gsocblogs/2024/blog_ATLCompression_IshanDarji.md @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ Below we are plotting compression speed and compression ratio generated by the a The ideal library would have high compression speed and low compression ratio. We can see that `brotli` covers the widest range, giving us the option to have the slowest compression speed in exchange for the lowest compression ratio, but also the second-fastest speed with the highest ratio. It is also immediately noticeable that `zlib` consistently gives compression ratios that are higher than desirable for the speed being compressed. Both `xz` and `lzlib` perform very similarly, where they do not offer the same range of options that `brotli` and `zstd` do, and they only operate in the slower and lower compression ratio end of the spectrum, but they are an improvement over `brotli` and `zstd` within that range. In the end, to compare each library with the most similar compression speed to `zlib` at compression level 1 we see: + | Library | Level | Ratio | Compression | Decompression | |---------|-------|-------|-------------|---------------| |zlib | 1 | 62.23 | 67.7 MB/s | 234 MB/s | @@ -108,6 +109,7 @@ In the end, to compare each library with the most similar compression speed to ` |brotli | 4 | 57.74 | 57.1 MB/s | 268 MB/s| Whereas when looking at the most similar compression ratios we see: + | Library | Level | Ratio | Compression | Decompression | |---------|-------|-------|-------------|---------------| |zlib | 1 | 62.23 | 67.7 MB/s | 234 MB/s |