Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Switch from Ltac to Ltac2 #165

Open
MarvinLira opened this issue Jul 31, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Switch from Ltac to Ltac2 #165

MarvinLira opened this issue Jul 31, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
Coq Related to Coq back end or base library enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@MarvinLira
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Check whether we should use Ltac2 rather than Ltac when defining tactics for Coq.
If the switch seems to be reasonable, redefine the current Coq tactics and make use of the new features.

Motivation

The new tactic language promises to have some enhancements compared to the current one inculding a type system.

Alternatives

Additional Context
@MarvinLira MarvinLira added enhancement New feature or request Coq Related to Coq back end or base library labels Jul 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Coq Related to Coq back end or base library enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@MarvinLira