You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Step 1: Adding pages: on initial screen, unclear if we're adding a single page or an entire site. Adding pages is core to the product and needs to be integrated
Step 2: No way to see what pages are included in Audit
You can group by pages on the audit.
Q: what is the distinction between "active" and "qualified"?
I don't see "qualified". But "Equalified" basically means fixed. The reason it is branded that way is because fixing an issue in the accessibility space can mean lots of things. We qualify fixes by saying they're "Equalified". "Active" is not fixed. No users have been confused on the meaning of this, so I don't think it needs to be spelled out further.
Q: What are the use cases for sorting by Equalified Items (Most to Least), Equalified Items (Least to Most), Ignored Items (Most to Least), Ignored Items (Least to Most)
It says "All Page Items" but is it actually related to a page, we're on the audit screen, no?
Only if you're grouping by page.
Step 5: Group by Page groups/rows appear to be headed by html page title? We don't currently have that in the system, it would have to be added, and even then would only work after an initial scan
This was a requested feature, so I'm just going to leave it in the mockup for now. The mockup does show it appearing after the scan.
Step 6: Axe-core Checks and Editorially sections should probably have a "select all" option for each
Considering we anticipate like large numbers of pages being added, I think we're going to need a more robust treatment for selecting/adding pages (also like there's no way to add URLs). Also feel like pages section should go first on this screen?
Missing menu items: Home and Account are the only menu items. Pages, Audits, and Logs(?) should all be in the header. In general this comp feels optimized for a single, very particular use case, with less thought given to general or day-to-day use
Folks can group by page/issue to see page/issue content. I can't imagine a use case when they need to look at all logs. Logs need to review when an audit does something weird. Like "why is that issue ignored?"
Bigger picture, as a functional comp it feels very maze-y right now, and doesn't work at all if steps are not taken in exactly the correct order. I feel like this may cause problems for even simple testing/review
Updated the README to focus on the fact that this is a guided demo. It would be a pain in the ass to make all links clickable and keep content with continuity. Plus, at this point it's good to hear exactly what people are thinking: https://equalifyeverything.github.io/equalify-v2/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
bbertucc
changed the title
Validate Screen Reader Spec, System Architecture, and Sales Strategy with core contributors (@wilsuriel03 @azdak @alexstine @heythisischris @kevinandrews1 @BaronWolfenstein) team in an hour meeting led by @bbertucc - each person is paid $70.
V2 Screen Reader Spec Validation
Jan 15, 2025
Posting @azdak's comments and my replies:
Done: https://equalifyeverything.github.io/equalify-v2/1-home.html
You can group by pages on the audit.
I don't see "qualified". But "Equalified" basically means fixed. The reason it is branded that way is because fixing an issue in the accessibility space can mean lots of things. We qualify fixes by saying they're "Equalified". "Active" is not fixed. No users have been confused on the meaning of this, so I don't think it needs to be spelled out further.
Good point. Removed: https://equalifyeverything.github.io/equalify-v2/3-audit_details-ran.html?
Only if you're grouping by page.
This was a requested feature, so I'm just going to leave it in the mockup for now. The mockup does show it appearing after the scan.
Done: https://equalifyeverything.github.io/equalify-v2/7-audit_editor.html
Done: https://equalifyeverything.github.io/equalify-v2/7-audit_editor.html
I err on the side of simplicity. If folks complain, we can add I guess.
Made the view options more verbose, but saving view options isn't a log item: https://equalifyeverything.github.io/equalify-v2/15-audit_details-tagged.html
Replaced it with a "Generate Ticket" button: https://equalifyeverything.github.io/equalify-v2/6-audit_details-page_groups.html
Folks can group by page/issue to see page/issue content. I can't imagine a use case when they need to look at all logs. Logs need to review when an audit does something weird. Like "why is that issue ignored?"
Updated the README to focus on the fact that this is a guided demo. It would be a pain in the ass to make all links clickable and keep content with continuity. Plus, at this point it's good to hear exactly what people are thinking: https://equalifyeverything.github.io/equalify-v2/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: