You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The undescrore is a bit annoying and makes constants rather lengthy because there are two undescrores then, e.g. 1.0_r_2.
I would have even proposed to remove the number in the name because I find 1._r_2 a bit confusing. 1._r2 is already a bit better.
Some people, like me, use dp for double precision, which gives 1._dp or 1.0_dp.
I also propose to remove underscores in r_1 and i_d as well. I just realised that I call i_d normally i4, which has also a number at the end :-( But I do not use it much anyway (but I use i8).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I propose to rename the constant
r_2
tor2
.The undescrore is a bit annoying and makes constants rather lengthy because there are two undescrores then, e.g.
1.0_r_2
.I would have even proposed to remove the number in the name because I find
1._r_2
a bit confusing.1._r2
is already a bit better.Some people, like me, use
dp
for double precision, which gives1._dp
or1.0_dp
.I also propose to remove underscores in
r_1
andi_d
as well. I just realised that I calli_d
normallyi4
, which has also a number at the end :-( But I do not use it much anyway (but I usei8
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: