You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently when running bastille, it only runs on one jail at a time. It would be nice if I could get them to run in parallel. This could greatly speed up some operations.
A switch with a number might work. The number being the number of jails ran in parallel. Default being 1, so current behavior is maintained.
I suppose I could call bastille in some kind of xorg or script per host and run it in parallel that way. I would think a switch or something similar so consistency is maintained would be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
not sure this is really an option. In the past when this was discussed, we have no way in a bash shell to spin up parallel processes. IF I am wrong on this, or someone has an idea of how to do it in parallel please jump in and correct me.
Also don't forge &, like command1 & command2. That said, @yancyb-ehit have you tried something like bastille command target & bastille other-command target ?
Currently when running bastille, it only runs on one jail at a time. It would be nice if I could get them to run in parallel. This could greatly speed up some operations.
A switch with a number might work. The number being the number of jails ran in parallel. Default being 1, so current behavior is maintained.
I suppose I could call bastille in some kind of xorg or script per host and run it in parallel that way. I would think a switch or something similar so consistency is maintained would be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: