-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Job Scrapper Service #18
Comments
I'm also fine is this is a future feature and not a part of the version 1 MVP |
Will look into this across the next few days |
I think generic support will be hard to achieve. What I can think of is to either
|
ok - lets table this for now, #2 could be an option down the road. What would be the effort in hours to do those two (glassdoor and indeed) @no13000 ? |
I assume it'll take somewhere between 10 - 12 hours for me to complete this |
@deld should we create a new repository for this service |
This isn't part of the MVP, so we won't work this right now. Just getting ideas as we may address this later. |
https://developer.careerbuilder.com/docs/v3jobid looks like careerbuilder has an api, can see if other job boards have an api, maybe this is one route.. |
I want to get your input on the best way to do this, but instead of making employers have to manually add jobs to yet another place, I wonder if can make it so that employers can just register a link to an existing board.
Fro example
When an organization is registered one of the fields would be:
jobBoard or jobBoardURL:
So for example if my job board was https://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=software&l=Baltimore%2C+MD
These would be on there:
All of these would be ignored, but if you saw a posting with a name and also #baltimoretech
then suck it into the data file:
processed: Junior Software Developer #baltimoretech
ignored: Junior Software Developer
Thoughts, is that very difficult to do....all job board are different so the scraper couldn't be generic....so in that case maybe just the job title and link (and not the description)?
what are your thoughts @no13000 ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: