You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks a lot for releasing a clean implementation of your model.
I am trying to reproduce the results reported in the paper for the Mocap dataset. Can I confirm that the default arguments in this file correspond to the best results reported in the paper (most of the things seem to match except the number of epochs)? If not, could you please share the best config?
There also appears to be a bug in the following line:
Hi!
Thanks a lot for releasing a clean implementation of your model.
I am trying to reproduce the results reported in the paper for the Mocap dataset. Can I confirm that the default arguments in this file correspond to the best results reported in the paper (most of the things seem to match except the number of epochs)? If not, could you please share the best config?
There also appears to be a bug in the following line:
scalable-inference-in-sdes/experiments/mocap/train_approx_ode.py
Line 446 in 3519d34
Should it be
weight*model_kl
instead ofweight**model_kl
?I tried training the model both before and after fixing this potential bug and I got the following test MSE values:
weight**model_kl
, decoder_dist: True, epochs: 1500 = 19.74 +/- 0.04weight*model_kl
, decoder_dist: True, epochs: 1500 = 17.32 +/- 0.03The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: