This is an English language model for the Citron Quote Extraction and Attribution System produced by BBC R&D.
| Parameter | |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Creation date | 15 November 2021 |
For technical details see: "Quote Extraction and Analysis for News". For more information please contact: [email protected].
Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence and the VerbNet 3.0 license.
This is an experimental model intended for research and evaluation.
The training data is based on text extracts from the Wall Street Journal, an American business-focused, English-language international daily newspaper based in New York City. It may not perform as well with text from other domains.
The performance of the model is reported in the Quantitative Analysis below using Exact Match and Overlap Match metrics for text spans.
The model was trained using the train and dev partitions of the PARC 3.0 Corpus of Attribution Relations. It also includes data extracted from VerbNet 3.3.
The Quantitative Analysis shown below was obtained using the test partition of the PARC 3.0 Corpus of Attribution Relations.
The Coreference Resolver was trained and evaluated using equivalent partitions of the CoNLL-2011 Shared Task dataset which covers a subset of the data in PARC 3.0.
PARC 3.0 and CoNLL-2011 are extensions of the Penn Discourse Treebank and Ontonotes corpora. These corpora are available under license from the Linguistic Data Consortium.
Citron was developed under the BBC's Machine Learning Engineering Principles which comprises of six guiding principles and a self-audit checklist.
The performance of this model is reasonably good but there is a significant error rate. Extracted quotes should always be checked against the original text to confirm the accuracy of the text spans and correctness of the attribution.
The overall performance of Citron using this model was measured using the Citron Evaluate script.
| Exact Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 93.3% |
| Recall | 73.6% |
| F1 | 82.3% |
| Overlap Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 96.5% |
| Recall | 63.9% |
| F1 | 76.8% |
| Exact Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 92.9% |
| Recall | 73.3% |
| F1 | 82.0% |
| Overlap Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 97.4% |
| Recall | 75.8% |
| F1 | 85.3% |
| Exact Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 67.3% |
| Recall | 53.1% |
| F1 | 59.3% |
| Overlap Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 93.2% |
| Recall | 75.3% |
| F1 | 83.3% |
| Exact Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 64.3% |
| Recall | 50.7% |
| F1 | 56.7% |
| Overlap Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 74.7% |
| Recall | 93.8% |
| F1 | 83.2% |
The performance of the individual components of Citron using this model was measured using the build scripts.
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 95.5% |
| Recall | 72.9% |
| F1: | 82.7% |
| Exact Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 92.5% |
| Recall | 89.2% |
| F1: | 90.8% |
| Overlap Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 89.3% |
| Recall | 93.1% |
| F1: | 91.1% |
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 100.0% |
| Recall | 99.6% |
| F1: | 99.8% |
| Exact Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 78.0% |
| Recall | 72.0% |
| F1: | 74.9% |
| Overlap Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 89.9% |
| Recall | 90.7% |
| F1: | 90.3% |
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 99.5% |
| Recall | 93.6% |
| F1: | 96.5% |
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Precision | 86.4% |
| Recall | 97.4% |
| F1: | 91.6% |
This document is adapted from "Model Cards for Model Reporting", M. Mitchell et Al, 2018
Copyright 2021 British Broadcasting Corporation.