Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MACE-mp float, size and optimizer tests #20

Open
kavanase opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

MACE-mp float, size and optimizer tests #20

kavanase opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@kavanase
Copy link

kavanase commented Jan 4, 2025

Hi!
Thanks for developing and maintaining such useful tools.
Just thought it might be useful to mention, in this preprint I tested a range of MACE-mp settings (model size, float64/32, ASE optimizer choice) etc for speed and accuracy on a large dataset of defect supercell relaxations, which may be of interest – e.g. float64 is recommended for geometry optimisations but these tests found that in most cases it gave essentially the same result as float32 (with a mean (total) absolute difference of 1.4 meV, standard deviation of absolute differences of 1.1 meV, for supercells of 80-800 atoms; much less than 0.1 meV/atom).

image
image
image
image

@ilyes319
Copy link
Contributor

ilyes319 commented Jan 6, 2025

Very cool thanks for sharing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants