You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi!
Thanks for developing and maintaining such useful tools.
Just thought it might be useful to mention, in this preprint I tested a range of MACE-mp settings (model size, float64/32, ASE optimizer choice) etc for speed and accuracy on a large dataset of defect supercell relaxations, which may be of interest – e.g. float64 is recommended for geometry optimisations but these tests found that in most cases it gave essentially the same result as float32 (with a mean (total) absolute difference of 1.4 meV, standard deviation of absolute differences of 1.1 meV, for supercells of 80-800 atoms; much less than 0.1 meV/atom).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
Thanks for developing and maintaining such useful tools.
Just thought it might be useful to mention, in this preprint I tested a range of
MACE-mp
settings (model size, float64/32, ASE optimizer choice) etc for speed and accuracy on a large dataset of defect supercell relaxations, which may be of interest – e.g.float64
is recommended for geometry optimisations but these tests found that in most cases it gave essentially the same result asfloat32
(with a mean (total) absolute difference of 1.4 meV, standard deviation of absolute differences of 1.1 meV, for supercells of 80-800 atoms; much less than 0.1 meV/atom).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: