Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quasi global coverage for "Region" #28

Open
heroldn opened this issue Jul 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Quasi global coverage for "Region" #28

heroldn opened this issue Jul 30, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@heroldn
Copy link

heroldn commented Jul 30, 2023

For "Region" one can currently select different continents or other named regions. However, there are some products (e.g. from satellite) that provide coverage from say -50 to 50 degrees latitude. This is normally called something like "quasi global" coverage.
This might not be possible but it would be nice to be able to specify a text string with the latitude/longitude coverage. e.g. instead of selecting "Global" I could type in "-50 to 50 degrees latitude".

@paolap
Copy link
Contributor

paolap commented Jul 31, 2023

Theoretically is possible to do it already as there's a specific geospatial object in the record metadata itself. However, it's not visualised in the forms and it would be tricky to add a proper query to it. The from date to date temporal range already gives you an idea that querying what falls into a specific region is not trivial. I think someone else eventually might add this feature to the main portal and we'll be able to leverage it. In the meantime we could add more region like the semi-global you pointed out.

@heroldn
Copy link
Author

heroldn commented Aug 8, 2023

Yes a "semi global" or "quasi global" might do for now. It would cover datasets that only go to certain latitudes or as Claire pointed out satellite swaths. And I think this would help narrow down users' searches sufficiently.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants