Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What land-sea mask do we use? #7

Open
ccarouge opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

What land-sea mask do we use? #7

ccarouge opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@ccarouge
Copy link
Member

CABLE takes the assumption the met. forcing defines the grid and the land-sea mask. This means the simulation runs exactly on the grid of the met. forcing and this forcing needs no interpolation/filling etc. operation.

JULES takes a different approach where the land-sea mask comes from a separate file or the land cover.

Which approach do we want to adopt? It seems avoiding regridding the met forcing before simulation is better but we need to decide.

@matlipson
Copy link

I agree it will be better to avoid regridding met-forcing and adapting new ancils to match. We can use tools such as ants.analysis.make_consistent_with_lsm() to a) remove land data outside met forcing region, b) fill missing land points (ants.analysis.FillMissingPoints) using a "spiral-search" nearest neighbour approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants